Literature DB >> 17927430

Variation in spectral-shape discrimination weighting functions at different stimulus levels and signal strengths.

Jennifer J Lentz1.   

Abstract

This study evaluated whether weights for spectral-shape discrimination depend on overall stimulus level and signal strength (the degree of spectral-shape change between two stimuli). Five listeners discriminated between standard stimuli that were the sum of six equal-amplitude tones and signal stimuli created by decreasing the amplitudes of three low-frequency components and increasing the amplitudes of three high-frequency components. Weighting functions were influenced by stimulus level in that the relative contribution of the low-frequency (decremented) components to the high-frequency (incremented) components decreased with increasing stimulus level. Although individual variability was present, a follow-up experiment suggested that the level dependence was due to greater reliance on high-frequency components rather than incremented components. Excitation-pattern analyses indicated that the level dependence is primarily, but not solely, driven by cochlear factors. In general, different signal strengths had no effect on the weighting functions (when normalized), but two of the five listeners showed variability in the shape of the weighting function across signal strengths. Results suggest that the effects of stimulus level on weighting functions and individual variability in the shapes of the weighting functions should be considered when comparing weighting functions across conditions and groups that might require different stimulus levels and signal strengths.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17927430     DOI: 10.1121/1.2756800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Spectral profile cues in comodulation masking release.

Authors:  Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perceptual weights for loudness judgments of six-tone complexes.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Daniel L Valente; Suyash N Joshi; Kendra K Schmid
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Individualized estimation of the Speech Intelligibility Index for short sentences: Test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Donghyeon Yun; Yi Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spectral weights for sample discrimination as a function of overall level.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Hongyang Tan; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The effect of presentation level on spectral weights for sentences.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Emily Buss; Karen A Doherty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Decay uncovered in nonverbal short-term memory.

Authors:  Tom Mercer; Denis McKeown
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-02

7.  Dynamic Reweighting of Auditory Modulation Filters.

Authors:  Eva R M Joosten; Shihab A Shamma; Christian Lorenzi; Peter Neri
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 4.475

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.