Literature DB >> 17920479

How precise is the determination of rotational alignment of the femoral prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty: an in vivo study.

W P Yau1, K Y Chiu, W M Tang.   

Abstract

Correct rotation of the femoral component is critical in avoiding patellar instability in total knee arthroplasty. This study attempted to compare the precision of 4 commonly used methods (transepicondylar axis [TEA], 3 degrees external rotation [ER] from posterior condylar line [PCL], perpendicular cut to Leo Whiteside line [WSL], and balanced flexion gap [GAP]) in determining the rotational alignment of the femoral prosthesis in an in vivo setting. The ranges of error were as follows: (1) TEA, 28 degrees (17 degrees internal rotation [IR] to 11 degrees ER); (2) PCL, 27 degrees (13 degrees IR to 14 degrees ER); (3) WSL, 32 degrees (17 degrees IR to 15 degrees ER); (4) GAP, 26 degrees (14 degrees IR to 12 degrees ER). If an error of more than 5 degrees from neutral alignment is defined as an outlier, 56% in TEA, 72% in PCL, 60% in WSL, and 20% in GAP methods would fall in the outlier zone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17920479     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.12.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  21 in total

1.  [Soft tissue balanced navigation of total knee arthroplasties].

Authors:  C Schnurr; I Stolzenberg; J Nessler; P Eysel; P König
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 2.  Rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Claudio Carlo Castelli; Daniele Antonio Falvo; Mario Luigi Iapicca; Valerio Gotti
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-01

3.  Is referencing the posterior condyles sufficient to achieve a rectangular flexion gap in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Christoph Schnurr; Jochen Nessler; Dietmar Pierre König
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Gap balancing versus measured resection technique for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Douglas A Dennis; Richard D Komistek; Raymond H Kim; Adrija Sharma
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Mechanical axis-derived femoral component rotation in extramedullary total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between femoral transverse axis and transepicondylar axis.

Authors:  Jai-Gon Seo; Young-Wan Moon; Ji-Soon Lim; Se-Jun Park; Sang-Min Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Analysis of the Geometry of the Distal Femur and Proximal Tibia in the Osteoarthritic Knee: A 3D Reconstruction CT Scan Based Study of 449 Cases.

Authors:  Dimitrios N Lyras; Craig Loucks; Robert Greenhow
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2016-04

7.  Comparison between patient-specific instruments and conventional instruments and computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chun Hoi Yan; Kwong Yuen Chiu; Fu Yuen Ng; Ping Keung Chan; Christian Xinshuo Fang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Femoral rotation in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of patient individualized jigs with gap balancing in relation to anatomic landmarks.

Authors:  W Fitz; S Jäger; J S Rieger; E Seebach; R G Bitsch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Evaluating distal femoral torsion and posterior condylar line reliability for adjusting femoral component rotation in TKA, Egyptian population radiographic study.

Authors:  Mohamed A Mahran; Ahmed A Khalifa; Moataz Abdelraheem Ahmed; Hatem M Bakr; Yaser E Khalifa
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-12-05

10.  Patient-specific instrumentation combined with a new tool for gap balancing is useful in total knee replacement: a 3-year follow-up of a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ting Deng; Tangyou Liu; Qing Lei; Lihong Cai; Song Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.