Literature DB >> 17911048

Context-dependent genetic benefits of polyandry in a marine hermaphrodite.

Dustin J Marshall1, Jonathan P Evans.   

Abstract

Numerous studies emphasize the potential indirect (genetic) benefits of polyandry in animals with resource-free mating systems. In this paper, we examine the potential for these benefits to fuel sexual selection and polyandry in the hermaphroditic ascidian Pyura stolonifera. Individuals were designated either sire (sperm producers) or dam (egg producers) at random and crossed in a North Carolina II breeding design to produce both paternal and maternal half siblings for our quantitative genetic analysis. We then partitioned the phenotypic variance in fertilization and hatching rates into additive and non-additive variance components. We found significant additive variance attributable to sire and dam effects at fertilization and hatching, suggesting the potential for selection to favour individuals carrying intrinsically 'good genes' for these traits. In separate analyses involving monandrous and polyandrous clutches, we found that both traits were elevated under polyandry, but the difference in hatching rates was due entirely to the difference in fertilization rates between treatments. When the hatching rates were standardized to account for variance at fertilization, there was no overall net benefit of polyandry for this trait. Despite this, we found that hatching success declined with increasing embryo densities, and that the slope of this decline was significantly greater in monandrous than polyandrous clutches. Hence, selection on embryo viability may still favour polyandry under restricted environmental conditions. Nevertheless, our results caution against interpreting elevated hatching success as an indirect genetic benefit of polyandry when variance in fertilization is not controlled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17911048      PMCID: PMC2391236          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  9 in total

Review 1.  Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits.

Authors:  M D Jennions; M Petrie
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2000-02

2.  The benefits of polyandry in the free-spawning polychaete Galeolaria caespitosa.

Authors:  D J Marshall; J P Evans
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.411

3.  Male-by-female interactions influence fertilization success and mediate the benefits of polyandry in the sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.

Authors:  Bryan D Neff; Trevor E Pitcher
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Paternal indirect genetic effects on offspring viability and the benefits of polyandry.

Authors:  Francisco García-González; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Good genes, genetic compatibility and the evolution of polyandry: use of the diallel cross to address competing hypotheses.

Authors:  T M Ivy
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Why reproduce sexually?

Authors:  G C Williams; J B Mitton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Heritability of pre-adult viability differences can explain apparent heritability of sperm displacement ability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A S Gilchrist; L Partridge
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  MHC class IIB alleles contribute to both additive and nonadditive genetic effects on survival in Chinook salmon.

Authors:  Trevor E Pitcher; Bryan D Neff
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.185

  9 in total
  10 in total

1.  Indirect parental effects on offspring viability by egg-derived fluids in an external fertilizer.

Authors:  Rowan A Lymbery; Jacob D Berson; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  How multiple mating by females affects sexual selection.

Authors:  Stephen M Shuster; William R Briggs; Patricia A Dennis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Genetic compatibility and hatching success in the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus).

Authors:  Rolando Rodríguez-Muñoz; Tom Tregenza
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Complex genotype by environment interactions and changing genetic architectures across thermal environments in the Australian field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus.

Authors:  Magdalena Nystrand; Damian K Dowling; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  "Nested" cryptic diversity in a widespread marine ecosystem engineer: a challenge for detecting biological invasions.

Authors:  Peter R Teske; Marc Rius; Christopher D McQuaid; Craig A Styan; Maxine P Piggott; Saïd Benhissoune; Claudio Fuentes-Grünewald; Kathy Walls; Mike Page; Catherine Rm Attard; Georgina M Cooke; Claire F McClusky; Sam C Banks; Nigel P Barker; Luciano B Beheregaray
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Multiple fitness benefits of polyandry in a cephalopod.

Authors:  Zoe E Squires; Bob B M Wong; Mark D Norman; Devi Stuart-Fox
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Population and life-stage specific sensitivities to temperature and salinity stress in barnacles.

Authors:  Ali Nasrolahi; Jonathan Havenhand; Anna-Lisa Wrange; Christian Pansch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Do genetic diversity effects drive the benefits associated with multiple mating? A test in a marine invertebrate.

Authors:  Laura McLeod; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Density drives polyandry and relatedness influences paternal success in the Pacific gooseneck barnacle, Pollicipes elegans.

Authors:  Louis V Plough; Amy Moran; Peter Marko
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  The more pieces, the better the puzzle: sperm concentration increases gametic compatibility.

Authors:  Craig D H Sherman; Emi S Ab Rahim; Mats Olsson; Vincent Careau
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.