Literature DB >> 15792231

Male-by-female interactions influence fertilization success and mediate the benefits of polyandry in the sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma.

Jonathan P Evans1, Dustin J Marshall.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have reported that females benefit from mating with multiple males (polyandry) by minimizing the probability of fertilization by genetically incompatible sperm. Few, however, have directly attributed variation in female reproductive success to the fertilizing capacity of sperm. In this study we report on two experiments that investigated the benefits of polyandry and the interacting effects of males and females at fertilization in the free-spawning Australian sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma. In the first experiment we used a paired (split clutch) experimental design and compared fertilization rates within female egg clutches under polyandry (eggs exposed to the sperm from two males simultaneously) and monandry (eggs from the same female exposed to sperm from each of the same two males separately). Our analysis revealed a significant fertilization benefit of polyandry and strong interacting effects of males and females at fertilization. Further analysis of these data strongly suggested that the higher rates of fertilization in the polyandry treatment were due to an overrepresentation of fertilizations due to the most compatible male. To further explore the interacting effects of males and females at fertilization we performed a second factorial experiment in which four males were crossed with two females (in all eight combinations). In addition to confirming that fertilization success is influenced by male x female interactions, this latter experiment revealed that both sexes contributed significant variance to the observed patterns of fertilization. Taken together, these findings highlight the importance of male x female interactions at fertilization and suggest that polyandry will enable females to reduce the cost of fertilization by incompatible gametes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15792231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  28 in total

1.  Females increase current reproductive effort when future access to males is uncertain.

Authors:  Katja U Heubel; Kai Lindström; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Maternal inheritance, epigenetics and the evolution of polyandry.

Authors:  Jeanne A Zeh; David W Zeh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Female mediation of competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Stefan Lüpold; Scott Pitnick; Kirstin S Berben; Cecilia S Blengini; John M Belote; Mollie K Manier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Egg Coat Proteins Across Metazoan Evolution.

Authors:  Emily E Killingbeck; Willie J Swanson
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Extreme sequential polyandry insures against nest failure in a frog.

Authors:  Phillip G Byrne; J Scott Keogh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Mating portfolios: bet-hedging, sexual selection and female multiple mating.

Authors:  Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez; Yukio Yasui; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Characterizing male-female interactions using natural genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Michael Reinhart; Tara Carney; Andrew G Clark; Anthony C Fiumera
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.645

Review 8.  How multiple mating by females affects sexual selection.

Authors:  Stephen M Shuster; William R Briggs; Patricia A Dennis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Chemically moderated gamete preferences predict offspring fitness in a broadcast spawning invertebrate.

Authors:  Mathew Oliver; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Do genetic diversity effects drive the benefits associated with multiple mating? A test in a marine invertebrate.

Authors:  Laura McLeod; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.