Literature DB >> 9332012

Heritability of pre-adult viability differences can explain apparent heritability of sperm displacement ability in Drosophila melanogaster.

A S Gilchrist1, L Partridge.   

Abstract

Sperm displacement has been the subject of a large number of evolutionary studies because of its effects on relative male reproductive success. To understand better the evolutionary role of variation in sperm displacement ability (SDA), an obvious aim is to measure its heritability. In this paper, we show that a standard method used to measure the heritability of SDA can be misleading. First, we show that using conventional methods (based on counts of adult offspring of multiply mated females), SDA appears to be heritable. However, an examination of potentially confounding variables strongly suggests that this result is misleading, and that the heritable component is more likely to be pre-adult viability. Consequently, it is likely that there is little measurable heritable genetic variation for SDA in D. melanogaster. We conclude that, although conventional methods of measuring sperm displacement will usually be adequate for phenotypic measurements, greater care must be taken when measuring genetic variances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9332012      PMCID: PMC1688593          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  11 in total

1.  Sperm transfer, storage, displacement, and utilization in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  G LEFEVRE; U B JONSSON
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  The accessory gland proteins in male Drosophila: structural, reproductive, and evolutionary aspects.

Authors:  P S Chen
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1996-06-15

3.  Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits.

Authors:  D Houle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Quantitative genetics of sperm precedence in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K A Hughes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Cellular basis and developmental timing in a size cline of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A C James; R B Azevedo; L Partridge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Postcopulatory sexual selection in an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix).

Authors:  C W LaMunyon; T Eisner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The population genetics of sperm displacement.

Authors:  T Prout; J Bundgaard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The estimation of intraclass correlation in the analysis of family data.

Authors:  A Donner; J J Koval
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Variation in sperm displacement and its association with accessory gland protein loci in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A G Clark; M Aguadé; T Prout; L G Harshman; C H Langley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The adult component of selection in Drosophila melanogaster: some aspects of early-remating activity of females.

Authors:  A Van Vianen; R Bijlsma
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.821

View more
  12 in total

1.  The role of male accessory gland protein Acp36DE in sperm competition in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T Chapman; D M Neubaum; M F Wolfner; L Partridge
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Sexual conflict and speciation.

Authors:  G A Parker; L Partridge
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Characterizing male-female interactions using natural genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Michael Reinhart; Tara Carney; Andrew G Clark; Anthony C Fiumera
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.645

4.  Chemically moderated gamete preferences predict offspring fitness in a broadcast spawning invertebrate.

Authors:  Mathew Oliver; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Cryptic gametic interactions confer both conspecific and heterospecific advantages in the Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrid zone.

Authors:  Merrill A Peterson; Erica L Larson; Margaret Brassil; Kati J Buckingham; Danielle Juárez; Joseph Deas; Donna Mangloña; Michael A White; Jonathan Maslan; Andrew Schweitzer; Kirsten J Monsen
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Quantifying the gender load: can population crosses reveal interlocus sexual conflict?

Authors:  Tristan A F Long; Robert Montgomerie; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Context-dependent genetic benefits of polyandry in a marine hermaphrodite.

Authors:  Dustin J Marshall; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Female genotypes affect sperm displacement in Drosophila.

Authors:  A G Clark; D J Begun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Delineating the roles of males and females in sperm competition.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans; Patrice Rosengrave; Clelia Gasparini; Neil J Gemmell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Do candidate genes mediating conspecific sperm precedence affect sperm competitive ability within species? A test case in Drosophila.

Authors:  Alberto Civetta; Scott Finn
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.