Literature DB >> 19049954

Genetic compatibility and hatching success in the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus).

Rolando Rodríguez-Muñoz1, Tom Tregenza.   

Abstract

Recent discussion of genetic benefits of polyandry and female mate choice has distinguished between two potential factors influencing offspring quality: (i) some males carry higher quality genes and (ii) males and females differ in their degree of genetic compatibility. We examined evidence for effects of good genes and genetic compatibility on embryonic survival of sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus), a fish species with external fertilization that spawns in North Atlantic rivers. Using in vitro fertilization, we made all possible crosses among 10 males and 5 females collected in the spawning grounds. Male identity did not have any significant effect on hatching success. However, female identity and male x female interactions had a highly significant effect on hatching success. Our results suggest that genetic compatibility between male and female genomes plays an important role in embryo survival during the early stages of development in the sea lamprey.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19049954      PMCID: PMC2665819          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  13 in total

Review 1.  Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits.

Authors:  M D Jennions; M Petrie
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2000-02

2.  Adaptive phenotypic plasticity and genetics of larval life histories in two Rana temporaria populations.

Authors:  Anssi Laurila; Satu Karttunen; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review.

Authors:  T Tregenza; N Wedell
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  The benefits of polyandry in the free-spawning polychaete Galeolaria caespitosa.

Authors:  D J Marshall; J P Evans
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Good genes, genetic compatibility and the evolution of polyandry: use of the diallel cross to address competing hypotheses.

Authors:  T M Ivy
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Sources of genetic and phenotypic variance in fertilization rates and larval traits in a sea urchin.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans; Francisco García-González; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  'Good-genes' and 'compatible-genes' effects in an Alpine whitefish and the information content of breeding tubercles over the course of the spawning season.

Authors:  Claus Wedekind; Guillaume Evanno; Davnah Urbach; Alain Jacob; Rudolf Müller
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits.

Authors:  D Houle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Potential fitness benefits from mate selection in the Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua).

Authors:  G Rudolfsen; L Figenschou; I Folstad; J T Nordeide; E Søreng
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Bile Acid secreted by male sea lamprey that acts as a sex pheromone.

Authors:  Weiming Li; Alexander P Scott; Michael J Siefkes; Honggao Yan; Qin Liu; Sang-Seon Yun; Douglas A Gage
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Why do we pick similar mates, or do we?

Authors:  Thomas M M Versluys; Ewan O Flintham; Alex Mas-Sandoval; Vincent Savolainen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Complex genotype by environment interactions and changing genetic architectures across thermal environments in the Australian field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus.

Authors:  Magdalena Nystrand; Damian K Dowling; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.260

3.  Fitness Benefits of Mate Choice for Compatibility in a Socially Monogamous Species.

Authors:  Malika Ihle; Bart Kempenaers; Wolfgang Forstmeier
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  Cryptic choice of conspecific sperm controlled by the impact of ovarian fluid on sperm swimming behavior.

Authors:  Sarah E Yeates; Sian E Diamond; Sigurd Einum; Brent C Emerson; William V Holt; Matthew J G Gage
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  The more pieces, the better the puzzle: sperm concentration increases gametic compatibility.

Authors:  Craig D H Sherman; Emi S Ab Rahim; Mats Olsson; Vincent Careau
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Genetic incompatibility of the reproductive partners: an evolutionary perspective on infertility.

Authors:  Jukka Kekäläinen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 6.918

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.