Literature DB >> 17905904

Recognition of time-compressed and natural speech with selective temporal enhancements by young and elderly listeners.

Sandra Gordon-Salant1, Peter J Fitzgibbons, Sarah A Friedman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goal of this experiment was to determine whether selective slowing of speech segments improves recognition performance by young and elderly listeners. The hypotheses were (a) the benefits of time expansion occur for rapid speech but not for natural-rate speech, (b) selective time expansion of consonants produces greater score increments than other forms of selective time expansion, and (c) older listeners benefit from time expansion of speech
METHOD: Participants (n=10-16 per group) were younger and older adults with normal hearing or with hearing loss. A repeated-measures design was used to assess recognition of sentence-length stimuli presented in 2 baseline speech rates: natural and 50% time compression. Selective time expansion of consonants, vowels, or pauses was applied to the natural-rate and time-compressed sentence-length stimuli.
RESULTS: Listeners showed excellent performance for natural-rate speech, regardless of time-expansion method. Recognition was significantly poorer for the time-compressed sentences, but performance by elderly listeners and listeners with hearing loss improved with selective time expansion, particularly when applied to consonant segments.
CONCLUSION: The findings support the hypothesis that older listeners and listeners with hearing impairment benefit from selective time expansion of consonants applied to rapid speech, without a corresponding decrement when applied to normal-rate speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17905904     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/082)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  25 in total

1.  Stimulus rate and subcortical auditory processing of speech.

Authors:  Jennifer L Krizman; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Effects of speech-rhythm disruption on selective listening with a single background talker.

Authors:  J Devin McAuley; Yi Shen; Toni Smith; Gary R Kidd
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Time-Compressed Speech Identification Is Predicted by Auditory Neural Processing, Perceptuomotor Speed, and Executive Functioning in Younger and Older Listeners.

Authors:  James W Dias; Carolyn M McClaskey; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-19

4.  Age-Related Compensation Mechanism Revealed in the Cortical Representation of Degraded Speech.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Lindsey Roque; Casey R Gaskins; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-08

Review 5.  Cortical and Sensory Causes of Individual Differences in Selective Attention Ability Among Listeners With Normal Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Sex differences in auditory subcortical function.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Auditory Training: Evidence for Neural Plasticity in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Perspect Hear Hear Disord Res Res Diagn       Date:  2013-05

Review 8.  Central presbycusis: a review and evaluation of the evidence.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Jennifer J Lister; Anthony T Cacace; Karen J Cruickshanks; George A Gates; Richard H Wilson; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Age effects in temporal envelope processing: speech unmasking and auditory steady state responses.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 10.  Selective attention in normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Virginia Best
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-10-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.