Literature DB >> 8082047

Broadband ultrasound attenuation and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients with hip fractures: which technique discriminates fracture risk.

A Stewart1, D M Reid, R W Porter.   

Abstract

There is considerable interest in predicting risk of hip fracture in order to allow targeting of preventive care. This study aimed to determine which of two methods best discriminates a hip fracture population from controls. Fifty women with fractured neck of femur, and 50 control subjects were scanned using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the spine and hip and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) of the os calcis. Significant differences between the two populations could be found for both DXA and BUA, with BUA showing the largest percentage difference (27%). The mean z-scores showed that BUA had the lowest, with the exception of DXA trochanter. However, no significant difference between BUA and DXA trochanter Z-scores was found. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that BUA has a superior sensitivity and specificity compared with DXA measurements, with DXA of the hip being better than the spine. This retrospective study shows that BUA is a better discriminator of hip fracture than DXA lumbar spine or DXA hip, which may have important implications for predicting those at risk of future hip fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8082047     DOI: 10.1007/bf00334324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  30 in total

1.  Bone ultrasonic attenuation in women: reproducibility, normal variation and comparison with photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  J G Truscott; M Simpson; S P Stewart; R Milner; C F Westmacott; B Oldroyd; J A Evans; A Horsman; C M Langston; M A Smith
Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas       Date:  1992-02

Review 2.  Health of the nation and osteoporosis.

Authors:  A S Dixon
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Selection of the optimal skeletal site for fracture risk prediction.

Authors:  R D Wasnich; P D Ross; L K Heilbrun; J M Vogel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Trabecular bone architecture in the pathogenesis and prevention of fracture.

Authors:  A M Parfitt
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1987-01-26       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Hip fracture and the use of estrogens in postmenopausal women. The Framingham Study.

Authors:  D P Kiel; D T Felson; J J Anderson; P W Wilson; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-11-05       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Preferential low bone mineral density of the femoral neck in patients with a recent fracture of the proximal femur.

Authors:  T Chevalley; R Rizzoli; V Nydegger; D Slosman; L Tkatch; C H Rapin; H Vasey; J P Bonjour
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Evidence for efficacy of drugs affecting bone metabolism in preventing hip fracture.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; B Gullberg; E Allander; G Dilşen; C Gennari; A A Lopes Vaz; G P Lyritis; G Mazzuoli; L Miravet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-11-07

10.  Rising incidence of fracture of the proximal femur.

Authors:  W J Boyce; M P Vessey
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-01-19       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound of the skeleton: review of its clinical applications and pitfalls.

Authors:  R D Danese; A A Licata
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Differences between the right and the left foot in calcaneal quantitative ultrasound measurements.

Authors:  Aydan Oral; Ayşe Yaliman; Dilşad Sindel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Diagnostic value of ultrasound analysis and bone densitometry as predictors of vertebral deformity in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  S Gonnelli; C Cepollaro; D Agnusdei; R Palmieri; S Rossi; C Gennari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Influence of handedness on calcaneal ultrasound: implications for assessment of osteoporosis and study design.

Authors:  G M Howard; T V Nguyen; N A Pocock; P J Kelly; J A Eisman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry measurement of the calcaneus: influence of region of interest location.

Authors:  K Brooke-Wavell; P R Jones; D W Pye
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 6.  The clinical role of BUA for the assessment of osteoporosis: a new hypothesis.

Authors:  C M Langton
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Age-related changes in Os calcis ultrasonic indices: a 2-year prospective study.

Authors:  A M Schott; D Hans; P Garnero; E Sornay-Rendu; P D Delmas; P J Meunier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Bone status assessed by quantitative ultrasound in healthy postmenopausal Polish women: normative data.

Authors:  W Pluskiewicz
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 9.  The epidemiology of quantitative ultrasound: a review of the relationships with bone mass, osteoporosis and fracture risk.

Authors:  E W Gregg; A M Kriska; L M Salamone; M M Roberts; S J Anderson; R E Ferrell; L H Kuller; J A Cauley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Bone status in rheumatoid arthritis assessed at peripheral sites by three different quantitative ultrasound devices.

Authors:  O R Madsen; C Suetta; C Egsmose; J S Lorentzen; O H Sørensen
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2004-05-18       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.