Literature DB >> 17902851

Non-ossicular signal transmission in human middle ears: Experimental assessment of the "acoustic route" with perforated tympanic membranes.

Susan E Voss1, John J Rosowski, Saumil N Merchant, William T Peake.   

Abstract

Direct acoustic stimulation of the cochlea by the sound-pressure difference between the oval and round windows (called the "acoustic route") has been thought to contribute to hearing in some pathological conditions, along with the normally dominant "ossicular route." To determine the efficacy of this acoustic route and its constituent mechanisms in human ears, sound pressures were measured at three locations in cadaveric temporal bones [with intact and perforated tympanic membranes (TMs)]: (1) in the external ear canal lateral to the TM, P(TM); (2) in the tympanic cavity lateral to the oval window, P(OW); and (3) near the round window, P(RW). Sound transmission via the acoustic route is described by two concatenated processes: (1) coupling of sound pressure from ear canal to middle-ear cavity, H(P(CAV) ) identical withP(CAV)P(TM), where P(CAV) represents the middle-ear cavity pressure, and (2) sound-pressure difference between the windows, H(WPD) identical with(P(OW)-P(RW))P(CAV). Results show that: H(P(CAV) ) depends on perforation size but not perforation location; H(WPD) depends on neither perforation size nor location. The results (1) provide a description of the window pressures based on measurements, (2) refute the common otological view that TM perforation location affects the "relative phase of the pressures at the oval and round windows," and (3) show with an intact ossicular chain that acoustic-route transmission is substantially below ossicular-route transmission except for low frequencies with large perforations. Thus, hearing loss from TM perforations results primarily from reduction in sound coupling via the ossicular route. Some features of the frequency dependence of H(P(CAV) ) and H(WPD) can be interpreted in terms of a structure-based lumped-element acoustic model of the perforation and middle-ear cavities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17902851      PMCID: PMC2680256          DOI: 10.1121/1.2769617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Acoustic responses of the human middle ear.

Authors:  S E Voss; J J Rosowski; S N Merchant; W T Peake
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  How do tympanic-membrane perforations affect human middle-ear sound transmission?

Authors:  S E Voss; J J Rosowski; S N Merchant; W T Peake
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.494

3.  [Importance of sound pressure transformation & sound protection for the auditory threshold].

Authors:  H SCHMITT
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1958 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.494

4.  Acoustic-structural coupled finite element analysis for sound transmission in human ear--pressure distributions.

Authors:  Rong Z Gan; Qunli Sun; Bin Feng; Mark W Wood
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Acoustics of the human middle-ear air space.

Authors:  Cara E Stepp; Susan E Voss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Determinants of hearing loss in perforations of the tympanic membrane.

Authors:  Ritvik P Mehta; John J Rosowski; Susan E Voss; Ellen O'Neil; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Acoustic input impedance of the stapes and cochlea in human temporal bones.

Authors:  S N Merchant; M E Ravicz; J J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Is the pressure difference between the oval and round windows the effective acoustic stimulus for the cochlea?

Authors:  S E Voss; J J Rosowski; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Analysis of middle ear mechanics and application to diseased and reconstructed ears.

Authors:  S N Merchant; M E Ravicz; S Puria; S E Voss; K R Whittemore; W T Peake; J J Rosowski
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-03

10.  Middle-ear transmission: acoustic versus ossicular coupling in cat and human.

Authors:  W T Peake; J J Rosowski; T J Lynch
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  13 in total

1.  Finite element modeling of sound transmission with perforations of tympanic membrane.

Authors:  Rong Z Gan; Tao Cheng; Chenkai Dai; Fan Yang; Mark W Wood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Békésy's contributions to our present understanding of sound conduction to the inner ear.

Authors:  Sunil Puria; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: Sensitive measures of tympanic -membrane perforation and healing processes in a gerbil model.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Glenna Stomackin; Xiaohui Lin; Glen K Martin; Timothy T Jung
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  The impact of topical and systemic enoxaparin sodium use on traumatic tympanic membrane perforation and myringosclerosis.

Authors:  Arif Bilge; Akif Gunes; Muharrem Dagli; F Fulya Koybasioglu; Ali Guvey
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Correlating the site of tympanic membrane perforation with Hearing loss.

Authors:  Titus S Ibekwe; Onyekwere G Nwaorgu; Taiwo G Ijaduola
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2009-01-04

6.  Small tympanic membrane perforations in the inferior quadrants do not impact the manubrium vibration in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Xiuling Zhang; Yanhong Dai; Shuyi Zhang; Wandong She; Xiaoping Du; Xiuji Shui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Forward and Reverse Middle Ear Transmission in Gerbil with a Normal or Spontaneously Healed Tympanic Membrane.

Authors:  Xiaohui Lin; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Glenna Stomackin; Timothy T Jung; Glen K Martin; Wei Dong
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-16

8.  The Dominance of Ossicular Route in Sound Transmission.

Authors:  Mohd Normani Zakaria; Aw Cheu Lih; Noor Alaudin Abdul Wahab
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.372

9.  In Reply: Dominance of Ossicular Route in Sound Transmission.

Authors:  Hanaro Park; Seung No Hong; Hyo Sang Kim; Jae Joon Han; Juyong Chung; Myung-Whan Seo; Seung-Ha Oh; Sun-O Chang; Jun Ho Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.372

10.  The anatomic determinants of conductive hearing loss secondary to tympanic membrane perforation.

Authors:  David J Carpenter; Debara L Tucci; David M Kaylie; Dennis O Frank-Ito
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2017-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.