Literature DB >> 11349771

How do tympanic-membrane perforations affect human middle-ear sound transmission?

S E Voss1, J J Rosowski, S N Merchant, W T Peake.   

Abstract

Although tympanic-membrane (TM) perforations are common sequelae of middle-ear disease, the hearing losses they cause have not been accurately determined, largely because additional pathological conditions occur in these ears. Our measurements of acoustic transmission before and after making controlled perforations in cadaver ears show that perforations cause frequency-dependent loss that: (1) is largest at low frequencies; (2) increases as perforation size increases; and (3) does not depend on perforation location. The dominant loss mechanism is the reduction in sound-pressure difference across the TM. Measurements of middle-ear air-space sound pressures show that transmission via direct acoustic stimulation of the oval and round windows is generally negligible. A quantitative model predicts the influence of middle-ear air-space volume on loss; with larger volumes, loss is smaller.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11349771     DOI: 10.1080/000164801300043343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  32 in total

1.  Is the Degree of Hearing Loss Truly Dependent on the Site of Tympanic Membrane Perforation?

Authors:  Mohd Zakaria; Nik Othman; Aw Cheu Lih
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2016-01

2.  Correlation of Tympanic Membrane Perforation with Hearing Loss and Its Parameters in Chronic Otitis Media: An Analytical Study.

Authors:  Amit Kumar Rana; Deepak Upadhyay; Akanksha Yadav; Surendra Prasad
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-10-12

3.  Determinants of hearing loss in perforations of the tympanic membrane.

Authors:  Ritvik P Mehta; John J Rosowski; Susan E Voss; Ellen O'Neil; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Finite element modeling of sound transmission with perforations of tympanic membrane.

Authors:  Rong Z Gan; Tao Cheng; Chenkai Dai; Fan Yang; Mark W Wood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Determinants of conductive hearing loss in tympanic membrane perforation.

Authors:  Hanaro Park; Seung No Hong; Hyo Sang Kim; Jae Joon Han; Juyong Chung; Myung-Whan Suh; Myung-Whan Seo; Seung-Ha Oh; Sun-O Chang; Jun Ho Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.372

6.  Influence of middle ear mucosal condition on post-tympanoplasty audiologic outcome.

Authors:  Chan Il Song; Hye Ran Hong; Tae Hyun Yoon
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  Békésy's contributions to our present understanding of sound conduction to the inner ear.

Authors:  Sunil Puria; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Audiogram of the chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) from 2 Hz to 9 kHz.

Authors:  Evan M Hill; Gimseong Koay; Rickye S Heffner; Henry E Heffner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Motion of the tympanic membrane after cartilage tympanoplasty determined by stroboscopic holography.

Authors:  Antti A Aarnisalo; Jeffrey T Cheng; Michael E Ravicz; Cosme Furlong; Saumil N Merchant; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Measurement of conductive hearing loss in mice.

Authors:  Zhaobing Qin; Melissa Wood; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.