Literature DB >> 17899107

Modern concepts of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and its diagnosis through percutaneous biopsy.

Ute Kettritz1.   

Abstract

The incidence of ductal breast carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is increasing and currently lies at about 15% of all breast cancers. Detection of DCIS reduces the subsequent incidence of invasive ductal carcinoma. Patients with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 lesions are best served by minimally invasive biopsies to improve the precision of diagnosing DCIS lesions. Vacuum-assisted biopsies have the greatest sensitivity and specificity of the biopsy techniques and reduce tumor upgrading of DCIS lesions at operation by at least half compared with core-needle biopsy. Moreover, vacuum-assisted biopsies have proved to be safe and reduce health care costs. Since they provide a maximum of preoperative information, vacuum-assisted biopsies could improve outcomes in patients with DCIS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17899107     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0753-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  66 in total

1.  Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-risk ductal carcinoma in situ patients.

Authors:  Cathal J Moran; Malcolm R Kell; Fidelma L Flanagan; Maria Kennedy; Thomas F Gorey; Michael J Kerin
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Ten-year results comparing mastectomy to excision and radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  M J Silverstein; A Barth; D N Poller; E D Gierson; W J Colburn; J R Waisman; P Gamagami
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation.

Authors:  R Holland; J H Hendriks
Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Impact of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy on diagnosis and surgical treatment of nonpalpable breast cancer.

Authors:  H M Verkooijen; I H Borel Rinkes; P H Peeters; M L Landheer; N J van Es; W P Mali; J H Klinkenbijl; T J van Vroonhoven
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.424

5.  Duct carcinoma in situ. Pathology and treatment.

Authors:  M D Lagios
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 6.  Standards for diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. American College of Radiology. American College of Surgeons. College of American Pathologists. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Authors:  D P Winchester; E A Strom
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Ultrasonic guided microbiopsy in mammary diagnosis: indications, technique and results.

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; S Krämer; N Lang; W Bautz
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.480

8.  Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.

Authors:  L Liberman; J H Smolkin; D D Dershaw; E A Morris; A F Abramson; P P Rosen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Factors predicting successful needle-localized breast biopsy.

Authors:  Page E Abrahamson; Larry A Dunlap; M Ahinee Amamoo; Michael J Schell; M Patricia Braeuning; Etta D Pisano
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Breast cancer and atypia among young and middle-aged women: a study of 110 medicolegal autopsies.

Authors:  M Nielsen; J L Thomsen; S Primdahl; U Dyreborg; J A Andersen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Non-operative diagnosis--effect on repeat-operation rates in the UK breast screening programme.

Authors:  M G Wallis; S Cheung; O Kearins; G M Lawrence
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Borderline breast lesions: comparison of malignancy underestimation rates with 14-gauge core needle biopsy versus 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device.

Authors:  Viviana Londero; Chiara Zuiani; Anna Linda; Luisa Battigelli; Giovanni Brondani; Massimo Bazzocchi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Reducing false-positive biopsies: a pilot study to reduce benign biopsy rates for BI-RADS 4A/B assessments through testing risk stratification and new thresholds for intervention.

Authors:  Chris I Flowers; Cristina O'Donoghue; Dan Moore; Adeline Goss; Danny Kim; June-Ho Kim; Sjoerd G Elias; Julia Fridland; Laura J Esserman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.872

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.