Literature DB >> 21225267

Borderline breast lesions: comparison of malignancy underestimation rates with 14-gauge core needle biopsy versus 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device.

Viviana Londero1, Chiara Zuiani, Anna Linda, Luisa Battigelli, Giovanni Brondani, Massimo Bazzocchi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare malignancy underestimation rates in the case of percutaneous diagnosis of borderline breast lesions(B3) at 14-g core-needle-biopsy (CNB) and at 11-g vacuum-assisted-biopsy (VAB).
METHODS: The histological results of 4764 image-guided breast biopsies were retrospectively reviewed. 300 B3, 151 benign papillomas, 88 radial sclerosing lesions, 46 lobular neoplasia, 15 atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at ultrasound-guided 14-g CNB (76%) or stereotactically-guided 11-g VAB (24%) were identified. On average, 5 cores were obtained with CNB and 12 with VAB. Biopsy variables were reviewed and correlated with surgical excision or follow-up (>24 months). Lesion- and device-specific underestimation rates of malignancy were calculated.
RESULTS: Surgical excision was performed on 237 lesions: 178 were benign, 21 atypical, 38 cancers. The remaining 63 lesions were unchanged at follow-up. Overall malignancy underestimation rate was 12.7% at 14-g CNB and 12.5% at 11-g VAB. Based on excision histology or follow-up, lesion-specific underestimation rates were: benign papillomas: 14-g CNB 11%, 11-g VAB 0%; RSL: 14-g CNB 6%, 11-g VAB 4%; LN: 14-g CNB 40%, 11-g VAB 23%; ADH: 14-g CNB 33%; 11-g VAB 22%.
CONCLUSION: In the case of percutaneous diagnosis of B3 lesions, underestimation of malignancy occurs regardless of the biopsy method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21225267     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-2053-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  36 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous image-guided core breast biopsy.

Authors:  Laura Liberman
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 2.  Update on atypical epithelial hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Jean F Simpson
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.306

3.  Percutaneous removal of benign mammographic lesions: comparison of automated large-core and directional vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy techniques.

Authors:  R J Jackman; F A Marzoni; K W Nowels
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Needle core biopsy can reliably distinguish between benign and malignant papillary lesions of the breast.

Authors:  P J Carder; J Garvican; I Haigh; J C Liston
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Uncommon high-risk lesions of the breast diagnosed at stereotactic core-needle biopsy: clinical importance.

Authors:  L E Philpotts; N A Shaheen; K S Jain; D Carter; C H Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Clinical management issues in percutaneous core breast biopsy.

Authors:  L Liberman
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  Comparison of rebiopsy rates after stereotactic core needle biopsy of the breast with 11-gauge vacuum suction probe versus 14-gauge needle and automatic gun.

Authors:  L E Philpotts; N A Shaheen; D Carter; R C Lange; C H Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Modern concepts of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and its diagnosis through percutaneous biopsy.

Authors:  Ute Kettritz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Comparison of automated versus vacuum-assisted biopsy methods for sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast.

Authors:  Liane E Philpotts; Regina J Hooley; Carol H Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 10.  Nonmalignant lesions in breast core needle biopsies: to excise or not to excise?

Authors:  Timothy W Jacobs; James L Connolly; Stuart J Schnitt
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.394

View more
  12 in total

1.  Diagnostic underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ at percutaneous core needle and vacuum-assisted biopsies of the breast in a Brazilian reference institution.

Authors:  Gustavo Machado Badan; Decio Roveda Júnior; Sebastião Piato; Eduardo de Faria Castro Fleury; Mário Sérgio Dantas Campos; Carlos Alberto Ferreira Pecci; Felipe Augusto Trocoli Ferreira; Camila D'Ávila
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

Review 2.  The Evolving Role of Vacuum Assisted Biopsy of the Breast: A Progression from Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy.

Authors:  Ian C Bennett; Apoorva Saboo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Differentiating vacuum-assisted breast biopsy from core needle biopsy: Is it necessary?

Authors:  Satoko Nakano; Yoshimi Imawari; Akemi Mibu; Masahiko Otsuka; Toshinori Oinuma
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Factors Indicating Surgical Excision in Classical Type of Lobular Neoplasia of the Breast.

Authors:  Constanze Elfgen; Christoph Tausch; Ann-Katrin Rodewald; Uwe Güth; Christoph Rageth; Vesna Bjelic-Radisic; Markus Fleisch; Claudia Kurtz; Jesus Gonzalez Diaz; Zsuzsanna Varga
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.268

5.  B3-lesions of the breast and cancer risk - an analysis of mammography screening patients.

Authors:  Oliver Hoffmann; Gesina Athina Stamatis; Ann-Kathrin Bittner; Georg Arnold; Rolf Schnabel; Karlgeorg Krüger; Rainer Kimmig; Martin Heubner
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-23

6.  Ultrasound-guided diagnostic breast biopsy methodology: retrospective comparison of the 8-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy approach versus the spring-loaded 14-gauge core biopsy approach.

Authors:  Stephen P Povoski; Rafael E Jimenez; Wenle P Wang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  Image-guided breast biopsy and localisation: recommendations for information to women and referring physicians by the European Society of Breast Imaging.

Authors:  Ulrich Bick; Rubina M Trimboli; Alexandra Athanasiou; Corinne Balleyguier; Pascal A T Baltzer; Maria Bernathova; Krisztina Borbély; Boris Brkljacic; Luca A Carbonaro; Paola Clauser; Enrico Cassano; Catherine Colin; Gul Esen; Andrew Evans; Eva M Fallenberg; Michael H Fuchsjaeger; Fiona J Gilbert; Thomas H Helbich; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Michel Herranz; Karen Kinkel; Fleur Kilburn-Toppin; Christiane K Kuhl; Mihai Lesaru; Marc B I Lobbes; Ritse M Mann; Laura Martincich; Pietro Panizza; Federica Pediconi; Ruud M Pijnappel; Katja Pinker; Simone Schiaffino; Tamar Sella; Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara; Anne Tardivon; Chantal Van Ongeval; Matthew G Wallis; Sophia Zackrisson; Gabor Forrai; Julia Camps Herrero; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2020-02-05

8.  Validation of a scoring system for predicting malignancy in patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia using an ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy.

Authors:  Jisun Kim; Wonshik Han; Eun-Young Go; Hyeong-Gon Moon; Soo Kyung Ahn; Hee-Chul Shin; Jee-Man You; Jung Min Chang; Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon; In Ae Park; Dong-Young Noh
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.588

9.  First International Consensus Conference on lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions).

Authors:  Christoph J Rageth; Elizabeth Am O'Flynn; Christopher Comstock; Claudia Kurtz; Rahel Kubik; Helmut Madjar; Domenico Lepori; Gert Kampmann; Alexander Mundinger; Astrid Baege; Thomas Decker; Stefanie Hosch; Christoph Tausch; Jean-François Delaloye; Elisabeth Morris; Zsuzsanna Varga
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Elite VABB 13G: A New Ultrasound-Guided Wireless Biopsy System for Breast Lesions. Technical Characteristics and Comparison with Respect to Traditional Core-Biopsy 14-16G Systems.

Authors:  Daniele La Forgia; Alfonso Fausto; Gianluca Gatta; Graziella Di Grezia; Angela Faggian; Annarita Fanizzi; Daniela Cutrignelli; Rosalba Dentamaro; Vittorio Didonna; Vito Lorusso; Raffaella Massafra; Sabina Tangaro; Maria Antonietta Mazzei
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.