Literature DB >> 7831529

Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation.

R Holland1, J H Hendriks.   

Abstract

Because of the large scale use of mammography, the incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has been increased fivefold to sixfold. The majority of these tumors are detected by mammographically significant microcalcifications. Their mammographic and histologic appearance is rather characteristic for the different types of DCIS. Microcalcifications associated with poorly differentiated DCIS appear on the mammogram as either linear, often branching, or as granular microcalcifications which are usually coarse. They correspond to the amorphous type calcifications on histology. Microcalcifications associated with well-differentiated DCIS appear on the mammogram usually as multiple clusters of fine granular microcalcifications, which correspond to the clusters of laminated, crystalline calcifications on histology. The distribution of DCIS is typically unicentric and segmental. In a series of 119 mastectomies, only a single case had a multicentric distribution. Based on the extent of microcalcifications, mammography usually underestimates the size of DCIS; although this discrepancy is less than 2 cm in 80% to 85% of the cases if state-of-the-art mammography, including magnification views, is used. Close co-operation between radiologist, pathologist, and surgeon is essential for the optimum management of patients with DCIS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7831529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol        ISSN: 0740-2570            Impact factor:   3.464


  23 in total

1.  The influence of clinicopathological features on the predictive accuracy of conventional breast imaging in determining the extent of screen-detected high-grade pure ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  L Hayward; R S Oeppen; A V Grima; G T Royle; C M Rubin; R I Cutress
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  What is the sensitivity of mammography and dynamic MR imaging for DCIS if the whole-breast histopathology is used as a reference standard?

Authors:  F Sardanelli; L Bacigalupo; L Carbonaro; A Esseridou; G M Giuseppetti; P Panizza; V Lattanzio; A Del Maschio
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Expression of the hypoxia-inducible and tumor-associated carbonic anhydrases in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  C C Wykoff; N Beasley; P H Watson; L Campo; S K Chia; R English; J Pastorek; W S Sly; P Ratcliffe; A L Harris
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Correlative imaging reveals physiochemical heterogeneity of microcalcifications in human breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Jennie A M R Kunitake; Siyoung Choi; Kayla X Nguyen; Meredith M Lee; Frank He; Daniel Sudilovsky; Patrick G Morris; Maxine S Jochelson; Clifford A Hudis; David A Muller; Peter Fratzl; Claudia Fischbach; Admir Masic; Lara A Estroff
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.867

5.  Predictive factors for breast cancer in patients diagnosed atypical ductal hyperplasia at core needle biopsy.

Authors:  Byung Joo Chae; Ahwon Lee; Byung Joo Song; Sang Seol Jung
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 6.  Modern concepts of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and its diagnosis through percutaneous biopsy.

Authors:  Ute Kettritz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Clinicopathologic, mammographic, and sonographic features in 1,187 patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast by estrogen receptor status.

Authors:  Gaiane M Rauch; Henry M Kuerer; Marion E Scoggins; Patricia S Fox; Ana P Benveniste; Young Mi Park; Sara A Lari; Brian P Hobbs; Beatriz E Adrada; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Wei T Yang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 8.  When can stereotactic core biopsy replace excisional biopsy?--A clinical perspective.

Authors:  M Morrow
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  High and intermediate grade ductal carcinoma in-situ of the breast: a comparison of pathologic features in core biopsies and excisions and an evaluation of core biopsy features that may predict a close or positive margin in the excision.

Authors:  Oluwole Fadare; Nathan F Clement; Mohiedean Ghofrani
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 2.644

10.  Radiological and pathological size estimations of pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, specimen handling and the influence on the success of breast conservation surgery: a review of 2564 cases from the Sloane Project.

Authors:  J Thomas; A Evans; J Macartney; S E Pinder; A Hanby; I Ellis; O Kearins; T Roberts; K Clements; G Lawrence; H Bishop
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.