Literature DB >> 17882693

Phonotactic probability and past tense use by children with specific language impairment and their typically developing peers.

Laurence B Leonard1, Jennifer Davis, Patricia Deevy.   

Abstract

A group of preschool-aged children with specific language impairment (SLI), a group of typically developing children matched for age (TD-A), and a group of younger typically developing children matched for mean length of utterance (TD-MLU) were presented with novel verbs in contexts that required them to inflect with past tense -ed. The novel verbs differed in their phonotactic probabilities. The children with SLI were less likely than the other two groups to produce the novel verbs with -ed. Furthermore, they were less likely to use -ed with novel verbs of low phonotactic probability than those of high probability; this difference was not seen in the other two groups of children. It appears that the phonotactic composition of verbs is one factor that can contribute to the variability of past tense use by children with SLI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17882693      PMCID: PMC4435720          DOI: 10.1080/02699200701495473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon        ISSN: 0269-9206            Impact factor:   1.346


  19 in total

1.  Sublexical or lexical effects on serial recall of nonwords?

Authors:  Steven Roodenrys; Melinda Hinton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Learning new words II: Phonotactic probability in verb learning.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Paul A Luce
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-08

4.  Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Jonna Armbrüster; Tiffany P Hogan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  A comparison of homonym and novel word learning: the role of phonotactic probability and word frequency.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Junko Maekawa
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2005-11

6.  Tense over time: the longitudinal course of tense acquisition in children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  M L Rice; K Wexler; S Hershberger
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Nonword repetition performance in school-age children with and without language impairment.

Authors:  S Ellis Weismer; J B Tomblin; X Zhang; P Buckwalter; J G Chynoweth; M Jones
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  P A Luce; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Morphological productivity in children with normal language and SLI: a study of the English past tense.

Authors:  V A Marchman; B Wulfeck; S Ellis Weismer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitive.

Authors:  M L Rice; K Wexler; P L Cleave
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1995-08
View more
  13 in total

1.  Children with a history of SLI show reduced sensitivity to audiovisual temporal asynchrony: an ERP study.

Authors:  Natalya Kaganovich; Jennifer Schumaker; Laurence B Leonard; Dana Gustafson; Danielle Macias
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Decreased sensitivity to long-distance dependencies in children with a history of specific language impairment: electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  J D Purdy; Laurence B Leonard; Christine Weber-Fox; Natalya Kaganovich
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Quantifying the relative contributions of lexical and phonological factors to regular past tense accuracy.

Authors:  Amanda J Owen Van Horne; Melanie Green Fager
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 2.484

4.  Morphology and syntax in late talkers at age 5.

Authors:  Leslie Rescorla; Hannah L Turner
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Influences of Phonological Context on Tense Marking in Spanish-English Dual Language Learners.

Authors:  Philip N Combiths; Jessica A Barlow; Irina Potapova; Sonja Pruitt-Lord
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  What compound words mean to children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Karla K McGregor; Gwyneth C Rost; Ling Yu Guo; Li Sheng
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2010-06-04

7.  The interface between neighborhood density and optional infinitives: normal development and Specific Language Impairment.

Authors:  Jill R Hoover; Holly L Storkel; Mabel L Rice
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2011-11-29

Review 8.  Using network science in the language sciences and clinic.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Nichol Castro
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.484

9.  Effects of a Complexity-Based Approach on Generalization of Past Tense -ed and Related Morphemes.

Authors:  Amanda J Owen Van Horne; Maura Curran; Caroline Larson; Marc E Fey
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Do the Hard Things First: A Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Effects of Exemplar Selection on Generalization Following Therapy for Grammatical Morphology.

Authors:  Amanda Jean Owen Van Horne; Marc Fey; Maura Curran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.