Literature DB >> 14700357

Learning new words II: Phonotactic probability in verb learning.

Holly L Storkel1.   

Abstract

Phonotactic probability, a measure of the likelihood of occurrence of a sound sequence, appears to facilitate noun learning (H. L. Storkel, 2001). Nouns and verbs, however, tend to differ in rate of acquisition, indicating that word-learning mechanisms may differ across grammatical class. The purpose of the current study was to examine the effect of phonotactic probability on verb learning. Thirty-four typically developing preschool children participated in a multitrial word-learning task involving nonwords varying in phonotactic probability paired with unfamiliar actions. Multiple measures of word learning were obtained at increasing numbers of exposures. Correct responses were analyzed to examine rate of word learning. Results paralleled those of the previous noun-learning study, with common sound sequences being learned more rapidly than rare sound sequences. The results are interpreted in relation to the effect of distributional regularities on acquisition and the reported discrepancy between noun and verb learning in English.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14700357     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/102)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  45 in total

1.  Beyond phonotactic frequency: presentation frequency effects word productions in specific language impairment.

Authors:  Elena Plante; Megha Bahl; Rebecca Vance; LouAnn Gerken
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  Online learning from input versus offline memory evolution in adult word learning: effects of neighborhood density and phonologically related practice.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Daniel E Bontempo; Natalie S Pak
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Effect of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word-learning configuration by preschoolers with typical development and specific language impairment.

Authors:  Shelley Gray; Andrea Pittman; Juliet Weinhold
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Paul A Luce
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-08

5.  Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Jonna Armbrüster; Tiffany P Hogan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Lexical competition in young children's word learning.

Authors:  Daniel Swingley; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Rapid word-learning in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children: effects of age, receptive vocabulary, and high-frequency amplification.

Authors:  A L Pittman; D E Lewis; B M Hoover; P G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Phonotactic probability and past tense use by children with specific language impairment and their typically developing peers.

Authors:  Laurence B Leonard; Jennifer Davis; Patricia Deevy
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.346

9.  Adult and child semantic neighbors of the Kroll and Potter (1984) nonobjects.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Suzanne M Adlof
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Extracting phonological patterns for L2 word learning: the effect of poor phonological awareness.

Authors:  Chieh-Fang Hu
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2014-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.