Literature DB >> 25879455

Quantifying the relative contributions of lexical and phonological factors to regular past tense accuracy.

Amanda J Owen Van Horne1,2, Melanie Green Fager3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Children with specific language impairment (SLI) frequently have difficulty producing the past tense. This study aimed to quantify the relative influence of telicity (i.e. the completedness of an event), verb frequency and stem final phonemes on the production of past tense by school-age children with SLI and their typically-developing (TD) peers.
METHOD: Archival elicited production data from children with SLI between the ages of 6-9 and TD peers aged 4-8 were re-analysed. Past tense accuracy was predicted using measures of telicity, verb frequency measures and properties of the final consonant of the verb stem. RESULT: All children were highly accurate when verbs were telic, the inflected form was frequently heard in the past tense and the word ended in a sonorant/non-alveolar consonant. All children were less accurate when verbs were atelic, rarely heard in the past tense or ended in a word final obstruent or alveolar consonant. SLI status depressed overall accuracy rates, but did not influence how facilitative a given factor was.
CONCLUSION: Some factors that have been believed to be useful only when children are first discovering past tense, such as telicity, appear to be influential in later years as well.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Past tense; SLI; child language; consonant cluster; lexical frequency; target selection; telicity

Year:  2015        PMID: 25879455      PMCID: PMC4608859          DOI: 10.3109/17549507.2015.1034174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1754-9507            Impact factor:   2.484


  19 in total

1.  The past and future of the past tense.

Authors:  Steven Pinker; Michael T. Ullman
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: what does the evidence rule out?

Authors:  James L. McClelland; Karalyn Patterson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study.

Authors:  Adam Albright; Bruce Hayes
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-12

4.  A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Paul A Luce
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-08

5.  Phonotactic probability and past tense use by children with specific language impairment and their typically developing peers.

Authors:  Laurence B Leonard; Jennifer Davis; Patricia Deevy
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.346

6.  The role of type and token frequency in using past tense morphemes correctly.

Authors:  Elena Nicoladis; Andrea Palmer; Paula Marentette
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2007-03

7.  An online calculator to compute phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on the basis of child corpora of spoken American English.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Jill R Hoover
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-05

8.  Interaction of lexical and grammatical aspect in toddlers' language.

Authors:  Bonnie W Johnson; Marc E Fey
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2006-05

9.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  Morphological deficits of children with SLI: evaluation of number marking and agreement.

Authors:  M L Rice; J B Oetting
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Influences of Phonological Context on Tense Marking in Spanish-English Dual Language Learners.

Authors:  Philip N Combiths; Jessica A Barlow; Irina Potapova; Sonja Pruitt-Lord
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Effects of a Complexity-Based Approach on Generalization of Past Tense -ed and Related Morphemes.

Authors:  Amanda J Owen Van Horne; Maura Curran; Caroline Larson; Marc E Fey
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Do the Hard Things First: A Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Effects of Exemplar Selection on Generalization Following Therapy for Grammatical Morphology.

Authors:  Amanda Jean Owen Van Horne; Marc Fey; Maura Curran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 4.  Five overarching factors central to grammatical learning and treatment in children with developmental language disorder.

Authors:  Laurence B Leonard; Justin B Kueser
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Insights Into Category Sorting Flexibility in Bilingual Children: Results of a Cognitive Lab Study.

Authors:  Gabriela Simon-Cereijido; Lisa M Bedore; Elizabeth D Peña; Aquiles Iglesias
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 2.408

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.