Literature DB >> 27106698

Coronary in-stent restenosis: predisposing clinical and stent-related factors, diagnostic performance and analyses of inaccuracies in 320-row computed tomography angiography.

Yung-Liang Wan1, Pei-Kwei Tsay2, Chun-Chi Chen3, Yu-Hsiang Juan4, Yu-Chieh Huang4, Wen-Hui Chan4, Ming-Shien Wen3, I-Chang Hsieh5.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify predisposing factors for coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) and assess its detection by 320-row computed tomography angiography (CTA) using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as a gold standard. A total of 189 patients (aged 35-79, mean age 56.6, 169 males) with 318 stents underwent ICA within 4 days after CTA. ISR was found in 19 (10.0 %) patients and 25 (7.9 %) stents. At the patient level, the presence of ISR was significantly related to the number of deployed stents (P = 0.026) and body mass index (P = 0.030). At the stent level, stents with diameter <3 mm were more likely to have ISR than those with diameter ≥3 mm (53.8 % vs. 28.9 %, P = 0.016). Bare metal stents were significantly more likely to have ISR than drug-eluting stents (15.2 % vs. 6 %, P = 0.022). ISR was not significantly related to stent length (P = 0.097) and stent placement in coronary arteries at the vessel level (P = 0.059). False-positive or false-negative results of CTA were not related to stent location, diameter, length, and strut thickness (P > 0.05). At the patient level, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of CTA for detecting ISR were 90, 96, 74, 99, and 96 %, respectively. At the stent level, the corresponding figures were 92, 96, 67, 99, and 96 %. The high negative predictive value of 99 % suggests that 320-row CTA is helpful for excluding ISR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography angiography; Coronary artery disease; Diagnostic accuracy; In-stent restenosis; Predisposing factors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27106698     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-016-0872-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  40 in total

Review 1.  Coronary in-stent restenosis - predictors, treatment and prevention.

Authors:  R Hoffmann; G S Mintz
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Dual-source CT angiography for detection and quantification of in-stent restenosis in the left main coronary artery: comparison with intracoronary ultrasound and coronary angiography.

Authors:  Josef Veselka; Pavla Cadova; Pavol Tomasov; Adla Theodor; David Zemanek
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.022

3.  Comparison of coronary flow velocity reserve measurement by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography with 320-row multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography in the detection of in-stent restenosis in the three major coronary arteries.

Authors:  Kentaro Kakuta; Kaoru Dohi; Tomomi Yamada; Takashi Yamanaka; Masaki Kawamura; Shiro Nakamori; Hiroshi Nakajima; Takashi Tanigawa; Katsuya Onishi; Norikazu Yamada; Mashio Nakamura; Tsutomu Nobori; Masaaki Ito
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Displacement and velocity of the coronary arteries: cardiac and respiratory motion.

Authors:  Guy Shechter; Jon R Resar; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Comparison of feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography versus intravascular ultrasound for evaluation of in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Daniele Andreini; Gianluca Pontone; Antonio L Bartorelli; Daniela Trabattoni; Saima Mushtaq; Erika Bertella; Andrea Annoni; Alberto Formenti; Sarah Cortinovis; Piero Montorsi; Fabrizio Veglia; Giovanni Ballerini; Mauro Pepi
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 6.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64 multislice CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Abdulrahman Marzouq D Almutairi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 7.  What are the potential advantages and disadvantages of volumetric CT scanning?

Authors:  Szilard Voros
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2009-01-09

8.  Noninvasive assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis by dual-source computed tomography.

Authors:  Tobias Pflederer; Mohamed Marwan; Alexandra Renz; Sven Bachmann; Dieter Ropers; Axel Kuettner; Katharina Anders; Fabian Bamberg; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Comparison of patient doses in 256-slice CT and 16-slice CT scanners.

Authors:  S Mori; M Endo; K Nishizawa; K Murase; H Fujiwara; S Tanada
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Incidence and predictors of drug-eluting stent fracture in human coronary artery a pathologic analysis.

Authors:  Gaku Nakazawa; Aloke V Finn; Marc Vorpahl; Elena Ladich; Robert Kutys; Isidora Balazs; Frank D Kolodgie; Renu Virmani
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  5 in total

1.  Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in the detection of coronary artery in-stent restenosis: evidence from an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Dai; Jiang-Rong Wang; Peng-Fei Hu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  SCCT 2021 Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: A Report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Jagat Narula; Y Chandrashekhar; Amir Ahmadi; Suhny Abbara; Daniel S Berman; Ron Blankstein; Jonathon Leipsic; David Newby; Edward D Nicol; Koen Nieman; Leslee Shaw; Todd C Villines; Michelle Williams; Harvey S Hecht
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2020-11-20

3.  Diagnostic value of intraluminal stent enhancement in estimating coronary in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Mehdi Karami Nogourani; Maryam Moradi; Amirreza Sajjadieh Khajouei; Maryam Farghadani; Atefeh Eshaghian
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2020-03-31

4.  The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Long Tang; Qian-Wei Cui; Dan-Ping Liu; Ying-Ying Fu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Added Value of Computed Tomography Virtual Intravascular Endoscopy in the Evaluation of Coronary Arteries with Stents or Plaques.

Authors:  Patricia Wanping Wu; Pei-Kwei Tsay; Zhonghua Sun; Syu-Jyun Peng; Chia-Yen Lee; Ming-Yi Hsu; Yu-Shien Ko; I-Chang Hsieh; Ming-Shien Wen; Yung-Liang Wan
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.