Literature DB >> 1787722

Masking-level differences in the elderly: a comparison of antiphasic and time-delay dichotic conditions.

M K Pichora-Fuller1, B A Schneider.   

Abstract

Four dichotic thresholds (S pi N0, S0 N pi, S0 N tau, and S pi N pi tau) were measured for young and old subjects using both burst and continuous broadband maskers. Masking-level differences (MLDs) were determined by subtracting dichotic thresholds from homophasic thresholds (S0 N0 or S pi N pi). The S0 N0 thresholds for the old subjects did not differ significantly from those for the young subjects in either the continuous or the burst masking noise conditions. The S pi N pi thresholds for the old subjects did not differ significantly from those for the young subjects in the continuous masking noise condition, but there was a significant age effect (3 dB) when burst masking noise was used. Both young and old subjects obtained larger MLDs in continuous masking noise than in burst masking noise. MLDs for old subjects were smaller than MLDs for young subjects by 4.3, 5.0, 2.7, and 1.6 dB in burst masking noise and by 4.9, 3.5, 2.5, and 1.4 dB in continuous masking noise, respectively in the S pi N0, S pi N pi tau, S0 N tau, and S0 N pi conditions. Four young subjects there was a hierarchy in the size of the MLD obtained in the four dichotic conditions, with the MLD being significantly larger in the S pi N0 and S pi N pi tau conditions; however, the size of the MLD was the same in all four conditions for the old subjects. Compared to young subjects, the performance of the old subjects was characterized by decreased ability to use homophasic cues in burst masking noise and decreased ability to use interaural difference cues. These findings were observed at four signal frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1787722     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3406.1410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  24 in total

1.  Studies on bilateral cochlear implants at the University of Wisconsin's Binaural Hearing and Speech Laboratory.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell; Shelly Godar; Tina Grieco-Calub; Gary L Jones; Soha N Garadat; Smita Agrawal; Alan Kan; Ann Todd; Christi Hess; Sara Misurelli
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Binocular unmasking with unequal interocular contrast: the case for multiple Cyclopean eyes.

Authors:  B Schneider; G Moraglia
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-12

3.  Effects of Aging on the Encoding of Dynamic and Static Components of Speech.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Kimberly Jenkins; Rachel Lieberman; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.

Authors:  Jayne B Ahlstrom; Amy R Horwitz; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Influence of aging on human sound localization.

Authors:  Marina S Dobreva; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Age-related differences in binaural masking level differences: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Robert Ellis; Julie Mehta; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Free-field study on auditory localization and discrimination performance in older adults.

Authors:  Claudia Freigang; Kristina Schmiedchen; Ines Nitsche; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effect of informational content of noise on speech representation in the aging midbrain and cortex.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Jonathan Z Simon; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Neural Correlates of the Binaural Masking Level Difference in Human Frequency-Following Responses.

Authors:  Christopher G Clinard; Sarah L Hodgson; Mary Ellen Scherer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-28

Review 10.  How aging impacts the encoding of binaural cues and the perception of auditory space.

Authors:  Ann Clock Eddins; Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.