Literature DB >> 17874600

Temporal uncertainty degrades perceptual processing.

Bettina Rolke1, Peter Hofmann.   

Abstract

When participants are required to react to a stimulus, reaction times (RTs) are usually reduced when temporal uncertainty about stimulus occurrence is minimized. Contrary to the common assumption attributing this RT benefit solely to the speeding of motor processes, recent evidence suggests that temporal uncertainty might rather influence premotoric processing levels. We employed a backward-masking procedure to further confine the locus of the temporal uncertainty effect. Participants performed a discrimination task and indicated whether a spatial gap within a square was on the right or the left side. In addition to the shorter RTs, visual discrimination accuracy was improved when temporal uncertainty was low. This result demonstrates that temporal uncertainty influences stimulus processing at a perceptual level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17874600     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  32 in total

1.  Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal them.

Authors:  S Sternberg
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2001-01

2.  Multiple bottlenecks in information processing? An electrophysiological examination.

Authors:  W Sommer; H Leuthold; T Schubert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

Review 3.  Which stages of processing are speeded by a warning signal?

Authors:  Steven A Hackley; Fernando Valle-Inclán
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential.

Authors:  Hiltraut Müller-Gethmann; Rolf Ulrich; Gerhard Rinkenauer
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Time uncertainty in simple reaction time.

Authors:  E T KLEMMER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-03

6.  The locus of temporal preparation effects: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.

Authors:  Karin M Bausenhart; Bettina Rolke; Steven A Hackley; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

7.  Differential effects of a foreperiod countdown procedure on simple and choice reaction time.

Authors:  J Richard Simon; D P Slaviero
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 1.328

8.  Does attention have different effects on line orientation and line arrangement discrimination?

Authors:  M Cheal; D R Lyon; D C Hubbard
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-11

Review 9.  Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking.

Authors:  D Kahneman
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06
View more
  18 in total

1.  Evoked potentials in motor cortical local field potentials reflect task timing and behavioral performance.

Authors:  Bjørg Elisabeth Kilavik; Joachim Confais; Adrián Ponce-Alvarez; Markus Diesmann; Alexa Riehle
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The effects of alerting signals in action control: activation of S-R associations or inhibition of executive control processes?

Authors:  Rico Fischer; Franziska Plessow; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-06-11

3.  The role of premature evidence accumulation in making difficult perceptual decisions under temporal uncertainty.

Authors:  Ciara A Devine; Christine Gaffney; Gerard M Loughnane; Simon P Kelly; Redmond G O'Connell
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Metrical expectations from preceding prosody influence perception of lexical stress.

Authors:  Meredith Brown; Anne Pier Salverda; Laura C Dilley; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  In touch with mental rotation: interactions between mental and tactile rotations and motor responses.

Authors:  Johannes Lohmann; Bettina Rolke; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Temporal Expectation Hastens Decision Onset But Does Not Affect Evidence Quality.

Authors:  Ruud L van den Brink; Peter R Murphy; Kobe Desender; Nicole de Ru; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Temporal expectation enhances contrast sensitivity by phase entrainment of low-frequency oscillations in visual cortex.

Authors:  André M Cravo; Gustavo Rohenkohl; Valentin Wyart; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The influence of phasic alerting on multisensory temporal precision.

Authors:  Qingqing Li; Peiduo Liu; Shunhang Huang; Xiting Huang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Mental fatigue modulates dynamic adaptation to perceptual demand in speeded detection.

Authors:  Robert Langner; Simon B Eickhoff; Michael B Steinborn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The time course of attention: selection is transient.

Authors:  Anna Wilschut; Jan Theeuwes; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.