Literature DB >> 33172980

Temporal Expectation Hastens Decision Onset But Does Not Affect Evidence Quality.

Ruud L van den Brink1,2, Peter R Murphy3,2, Kobe Desender3,4,5, Nicole de Ru2, Sander Nieuwenhuis2,6.   

Abstract

The ability to predict the timing of forthcoming events, known as temporal expectation, has a strong impact on human information processing. Although there is growing consensus that temporal expectations enhance the speed and accuracy of perceptual decisions, it remains unclear whether they affect the decision process itself, or non-decisional (sensory/motor) processes. Here, healthy human participants (N = 21; 18 female) used predictive auditory cues to anticipate the timing of low-contrast visual stimuli they were required to detect. Modeling of the behavioral data using a prominent sequential sampling model indicated that temporal expectations speeded up non-decisional processes but had no effect on decision formation. Electrophysiological recordings confirmed and extended this result: temporal expectations hastened the onset of a neural signature of decision formation but had no effect on its build-up rate. Anticipatory α band power was modulated by temporal expectation and co-varied with intrinsic trial-by-trial variability in behavioral and neural signatures of the onset latency of the decision process. These findings highlight how temporal predictions optimize our interaction with unfolding sensory events.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Temporal expectation enhances performance, but the locus of this effect remains debated. Here, we contrasted the two dominant accounts: enhancement through (1) expedited decision onset, or (2) an increase in the quality of sensory evidence. We manipulated expectations about the onset of a dim visual target using a temporal cueing paradigm, and probed the locus of the expectation effect with two complementary approaches: drift diffusion modeling (DDM) of behavior, and estimation of the onset and progression of the decision process from a supramodal accumulation-to-bound signal in simultaneously measured EEG signals. Behavioral modeling and neural data provided strong, converging evidence for an account in which temporal expectations enhance perception by speeding up decision onset, without affecting evidence quality.
Copyright © 2021 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; decision-making; drift diffusion modeling; expectation; perception

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33172980      PMCID: PMC7786203          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1103-20.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  75 in total

1.  Alpha rhythm of the EEG modulates visual detection performance in humans.

Authors:  Tolgay Ergenoglu; Tamer Demiralp; Zubeyir Bayraktaroglu; Mehmet Ergen; Huseyin Beydagi; Yagiz Uresin
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-08

2.  Attentional preparation based on temporal expectancy modulates processing at the perceptual level.

Authors:  Angel Correa; Juan Lupiáñez; Pío Tudela
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

3.  Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: a review and new evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Angel Correa; Juan Lupiáñez; Eduardo Madrid; Pío Tudela
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Localization of temporal preparation effects via trisected reaction time.

Authors:  Steven A Hackley; Andrea Schankin; Andreas Wohlschlaeger; Edmund Wascher
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Where and when to pay attention: the neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI.

Authors:  J T Coull; A C Nobre
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Diffusion model for one-choice reaction-time tasks and the cognitive effects of sleep deprivation.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Hans P A Van Dongen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  An action-independent signature of perceptual choice in the human brain.

Authors:  Anne E Urai; Thomas Pfeffer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions.

Authors:  B U Forstmann; R Ratcliff; E-J Wagenmakers
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 24.137

9.  The latency of a visual evoked potential tracks the onset of decision making.

Authors:  Michael D Nunez; Aishwarya Gosai; Joachim Vandekerckhove; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Alpha and gamma oscillations characterize feedback and feedforward processing in monkey visual cortex.

Authors:  Timo van Kerkoerle; Matthew W Self; Bruno Dagnino; Marie-Alice Gariel-Mathis; Jasper Poort; Chris van der Togt; Pieter R Roelfsema
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

1.  Spatial attention tunes temporal processing in early visual cortex by speeding and slowing alpha oscillations.

Authors:  Poppy Sharp; Tjerk Gutteling; David Melcher; Clayton Hickey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 6.709

2.  Surprising Threats Accelerate Conscious Perception.

Authors:  Jessica McFadyen; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Jason B Mattingley; Marta I Garrido
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.617

3.  Proactive and reactive accumulation-to-bound processes compete during perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Jaime de la Rocha; Alexandre Hyafil; Lluís Hernández-Navarro; Ainhoa Hermoso-Mendizabal; Daniel Duque
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Context dependency of time-based event-related expectations for different modalities.

Authors:  Felix Ball; Julia Andreca; Toemme Noesselt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-07-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.