Literature DB >> 11256336

Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal them.

S Sternberg1.   

Abstract

How can we divide a complex mental process into meaningful parts? In this paper, I explore an approach in which processes are divided into parts that are modular in the sense of being separately modifiable. Evidence for separate modifiability is provided by an instance of selective influence: two factors F and G (usually experimental manipulations) such that part A is influenced by F but invariant with respect to G, while part B is influenced by G but invariant with respect to F. Such evidence also indicates that the modules are functionally distinct. If we have pure measures MA and MB, each of which reflects only one of the parts, we need to show that MA is influenced by F but not G, while MB is influenced by G but not F. If we have only a composite measure MAB of the entire process, we usually also need to confirm a combination rule for how the parts contribute to MAB. I present a taxonomy of separate-modifiability methods, discuss their inferential logic, and describe several examples in each category. The three categories involve measures that are derived pure (based on different transformations of the same data; example: separation of sensory and decision processes by signal detection theory), direct pure (based on different data; example: selective effects of adaptation on spatial-frequency thresholds), and composite (examples: the multiplicative-factor method for the analysis of response rate; the additive-factor method for the analysis of reaction time). Six of the examples concern behavioral measures and functional processes, while four concern brain measures and neural processes. They have been chosen for their interest and importance; their diversity of measures, species, and combination rules; their illustration of different ways of thinking about data; the questions they suggest about possibilities and limitations of the separate-modifiability approach; and the case they make for the fruitfulness of searching for mental modules.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11256336     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(00)00045-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  61 in total

1.  Temporal organization of covert motor processes during response selection and preparation.

Authors:  Allen Osman; Cathleen M Moore; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  The serial-parallel dilemma: a case study in a linkage of theory and method.

Authors:  James T Townsend; Michael J Wenger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

3.  A direct intracranial record of emotions evoked by subliminal words.

Authors:  Lionel Naccache; Raphaël Gaillard; Claude Adam; Dominique Hasboun; Stéphane Clémenceau; Michel Baulac; Stanislas Dehaene; Laurent Cohen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Information processing during physical exercise: a chronometric and electromyographic study.

Authors:  Karen Davranche; Borís Burle; Michel Audiffren; Thierry Hasbroucq
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The locus of temporal preparation effects: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.

Authors:  Karin M Bausenhart; Bettina Rolke; Steven A Hackley; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

Review 6.  Experimental design and interpretation of functional neuroimaging studies of cognitive processes.

Authors:  David Caplan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  The effect of visual search efficiency on response preparation: neurophysiological evidence for discrete flow.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Min-Suk Kang; Kirk Thompson; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-02

8.  Distinguishing conjoint and independent neural tuning for stimulus features with fMRI adaptation.

Authors:  Daniel M Drucker; Wesley Thomas Kerr; Geoffrey Karl Aguirre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Temporal uncertainty degrades perceptual processing.

Authors:  Bettina Rolke; Peter Hofmann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06

10.  Reward rate optimization in two-alternative decision making: empirical tests of theoretical predictions.

Authors:  Patrick Simen; David Contreras; Cara Buck; Peter Hu; Philip Holmes; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.