Literature DB >> 1775666

Does attention have different effects on line orientation and line arrangement discrimination?

M Cheal1, D R Lyon, D C Hubbard.   

Abstract

Visual search and texture segregation studies have led to the inference that stimuli differing in the orientation of their component line segments can be distinguished without focal attention, whereas stimuli that differ only in the arrangement of line segments cannot. In most of this research, the locus of attention has not been explicitly manipulated. In the first experiment presented here, attention was directed to a relevant peripheral target by a cue presented near the target location or at the fovea. Effects of attention on orientation discrimination were assessed in a two-alternative forced-choice task with targets that were either: (1) lines that slanted obliquely to the right or left, or were horizontal or vertical, or (2) Y-like targets that had a short arm leading obliquely right or left of a vertical line. In some groups, a four-alternative forced-choice test with lines at 0 degree, 45 degrees, 90 degrees, and 135 degrees orientations was used. Discrimination of these targets (i.e. targets that differ in the orientation of component line segments) was only minimally facilitated as the time between the onset of the valid cue and the onset of the target (cue-target stimulus onset asynchrony, SOA) was increased from 0 or 17 msec to 267 msec. In contrast, discrimination of targets that did not differ in the orientation of component line segments but differed in line arrangement (T-like characters), was greatly facilitated by longer cue-target SOAs. In Experiment 2, a cue misdirected attention on 20% of the trials. A decrement occurred on incorrectly cued trials in comparison to correctly cued trials for both types of stimuli used (lines and Ts). The results from these experiments suggest that discrimination of line orientation benefits less from focal attention than does discrimination of line arrangement, but that both discriminations suffer when attention must be disengaged from an irrelevant spatial location.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1775666     DOI: 10.1080/14640749108400959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  13 in total

1.  The Beck effect is back, now in color: a demonstration.

Authors:  David Navon; Ruth Kimchi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

2.  Does attention impair temporal discrimination? Examining non-attentional accounts.

Authors:  Bettina Rolke; Angela Dinkelbach; Elisabeth Hein; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-26

Review 3.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Differential effects of exogenous and endogenous attention on second-order texture contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Antoine Barbot; Michael S Landy; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  In search of exogenous feature-based attention.

Authors:  Ian Donovan; Ying Joey Zhou; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Temporal uncertainty degrades perceptual processing.

Authors:  Bettina Rolke; Peter Hofmann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06

7.  How exogenous spatial attention affects visual representation.

Authors:  Antonio Fernández; Hsin-Hung Li; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Diverse Temporal Dynamics of Repetition Suppression Revealed by Intracranial Recordings in the Human Ventral Temporal Cortex.

Authors:  Vinitha Rangarajan; Corentin Jacques; Robert T Knight; Kevin S Weiner; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  The effects of spatial and temporal cueing on metacontrast masking.

Authors:  Maximilian Bruchmann; Philipp Hintze; Simon Mota
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-12-22

10.  Transient perceptual enhancements resulting from selective shifts of exogenous attention in the central fovea.

Authors:  Yue Zhang; Natalya Shelchkova; Rania Ezzo; Martina Poletti
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 10.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.