Literature DB >> 25427670

Spinal osteotomy in the presence of massive lumbar epidural scarring.

Vincent Arlet1.   

Abstract

The combination of Massive epidural scarring and spinal deformity represents the ultimate challenge for the spinal deformity surgeon. This is observed more and more as the population is aging and the number of spine surgery is increasing. In assessing the patient with spinal deformity and epidural scarring, one should carry out a thorough medical work up including Dexa scan, comorbidities, and in most cases a Myelo-CT scan that will identify the extent of the previous fusion, the fixed or semi-rigid nature of the deformity with complete anterior fusion or only bone bridges, the evaluation of the previous instrumentation (if present) with possible screw misplacement, or halo around the screws, the extent of the previous laminectomy, the spinal stenosis and possible arachnoiditis and or meningocele. Once the requirement of deformity correction has been established with specific attention to the pelvic incidence and amount of lordosis required two basic choices can be made. The first one is to perform the spine realignment outside the massive epidural scarring whether this will be performed through simple posterior osteotomies, TLIF combined with Smith-Petersen osteotomies or Pedicle subtraction osteotomies. One should not forget about all the possibilities of an anterior or lateral approach to the spine that can also judiciously realign the spine at the level or at distance of the massive epidural scarring. These anterior realignments have to be supplemented with posterior fixation and or osteotomies. The other alternative is to perform the spine osteotomy at the level of the massive epidural scarring preferably at the junction of normal dura and epidural scar. Working around the dura that will require to be thinned down before the osteotomy is performed represents another challenge where incidental durotomies are not infrequent. During the closing of the osteotomy the dura may not be as giving as a normal dura and too aggressive closure of the osteotomy may not be possible. Instead a closing/opening osteotomy may be preferable, but will require an additional anterior column support. Attention to anterior column reconstruction and solid posterior instrumentation (iliac screws, four rods) should be given to all these revisions to have a long-lasting result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25427670     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3652-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  13 in total

1.  The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy classification.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Benjamin Blondel; Edward Chay; Jason Demakakos; Lawrence Lenke; Patrick Tropiano; Christopher Ames; Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Steven Glassman; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Risk factors for unintended durotomy during spine surgery: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Geoff A Baker; Amy M Cizik; Richard J Bransford; Carlo Bellabarba; Mark A Konodi; Jens R Chapman; Michael J Lee
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Incidental durotomy during spinal surgery: a multivariate analysis for risk factors.

Authors:  Jerry Y Du; Alexander Aichmair; Janina Kueper; Cyrena Lam; Joseph T Nguyen; Frank P Cammisa; Darren R Lebl
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Long fusion from sacrum to thoracic spine for adult spinal deformity with sagittal imbalance: upper versus lower thoracic spine as site of upper instrumented vertebra.

Authors:  Takahito Fujimori; Shinichi Inoue; Hai Le; William W Schairer; Sigurd H Berven; Bobby K Tay; Vedat Deviren; Shane Burch; Motoki Iwasaki; Serena S Hu
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.047

5.  Complications and intercenter variability of three-column osteotomies for spinal deformity surgery: a retrospective review of 423 patients.

Authors:  Kristina Bianco; Robert Norton; Frank Schwab; Justin S Smith; Eric Klineberg; Ibrahim Obeid; Gregory Mundis; Christopher I Shaffrey; Khaled Kebaish; Richard Hostin; Robert Hart; Munish C Gupta; Douglas Burton; Christopher Ames; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.047

6.  Evaluation of complications and neurological deficits with three-column spine reconstructions for complex spinal deformity: a retrospective Scoli-RISK-1 study.

Authors:  Michael P Kelly; Lawrence G Lenke; Christopher I Shaffrey; Christopher P Ames; Leah Y Carreon; Virginie Lafage; Justin S Smith; Adam L Shimer
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 7.  Junctional spinal disorders in operated adult spinal deformities: present understanding and future perspectives.

Authors:  V Arlet; M Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Neurologic complications of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a 10-year assessment.

Authors:  Jacob M Buchowski; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Craig A Kuhns; Ronald A Lehman; Youngjung J Kim; David Stewart; Chris Baldus
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Reversal of neurologic deterioration after vertebral column resection by spinal cord untethering and duraplasty.

Authors:  Brian A O'Shaughnessy; Tyler R Koski; Stephen L Ondra
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Fate of the adult revision spinal deformity patient: a single institution experience.

Authors:  Michael P Kelly; Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell; Rashmi Agarwal; Jakub Godzik; Linda Koester
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Correction of kyphotic fixed lumbar segments and hypolordosis with the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion technique].

Authors:  F Lattig; E Stettin; S Weckbach
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 2.  Osteotomies in ankylosing spondylitis: where, how many, and how much?

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Juliane Koller; Michael Mayer; Axel Hempfing; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 3.134

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.