Literature DB >> 17846803

The use of physical biomodelling in complex spinal surgery.

Maree T Izatt1, Paul L P J Thorpe, Robert G Thompson, Paul S D'Urso, Clayton J Adam, John W S Earwaker, Robert D Labrom, Geoffrey N Askin.   

Abstract

Prior studies have suggested that biomodels enhance patient education, preoperative planning and intra-operative stereotaxy; however, the usefulness of biomodels compared to regular imaging modalities such as X-ray, CT and MR has not been quantified. Our objective was to quantify the surgeon's perceptions on the usefulness of biomodels compared to standard visualisation modalities for preoperative planning and intra-operative anatomical reference. Physical biomodels were manufactured for a series of 26 consecutive patients with complex spinal pathologies using a stereolithographic technique based on CT data. The biomodels were used preoperatively for surgical planning and customising implants, and intra-operatively for anatomical reference. Following surgery, a detailed biomodel utility survey was completed by the surgeons, and informal telephone interviews were conducted with patients. Using biomodels, 21 deformity and 5 tumour cases were performed. Surgeons stated that the anatomical details were better visible on the biomodel than on other imaging modalities in 65% of cases, and exclusively visible on the biomodel in 11% of cases. Preoperative use of the biomodel led to a different decision regarding the choice of osteosynthetic materials used in 52% of cases, and the implantation site of osteosynthetic material in 74% of cases. Surgeons reported that the use of biomodels reduced operating time by a mean of 8% in tumour patients and 22% in deformity procedures. This study supports biomodelling as a useful, and sometimes essential tool in the armamentarium of imaging techniques used for complex spinal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17846803      PMCID: PMC2200746          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0289-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  12 in total

1.  Biomodeling as an aid to spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  Paul S D'Urso; Owen D Williamson; Robert G Thompson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Three-dimensional reconstruction in routine computerized tomography of the skull and spine. Experience based on 161 cases.

Authors:  L Bonnier; K Ayadi; A Vasdev; G Crouzet; B Raphael
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.447

3.  Three-dimensional computed tomographic reformation of the spine, skull, and brain from axial images.

Authors:  C Virapongse; M Shapiro; A Gmitro; M Sarwar
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Spinal biomodeling.

Authors:  P S D'Urso; G Askin; J S Earwaker; G S Merry; R G Thompson; T M Barker; D J Effeney
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Stereolithographic biomodelling in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a prospective trial.

Authors:  P S D'Urso; T M Barker; W J Earwaker; L J Bruce; R L Atkinson; M W Lanigan; J F Arvier; D J Effeney
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Polyurethane real-size models used in planning complex spinal surgery.

Authors:  M van Dijk; T H Smit; T U Jiya; P I Wuisman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Biomodel-guided stereotaxy.

Authors:  P S D'Urso; B I Hall; R L Atkinson; M J Weidmann; M J Redmond
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Orthopedic and neurosurgical treatment of severe kyphosis in myelomeningocele.

Authors:  S Fürderer; C Hopf; M Schwarz; D Voth
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Three-dimensional computed tomography in the diagnosis of vertebral column pathological conditions.

Authors:  M N Hadley; V K Sonntag; M R Amos; J A Hodak; L J Lopez
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Kyphectomy in children with myelomeningocele: a long-term outcome study.

Authors:  D M Niall; F E Dowling; E E Fogarty; D P Moore; C Goldberg
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2007.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Feasibility and Validity of Printing 3D Heart Models from Rotational Angiography.

Authors:  Manoj Parimi; John Buelter; Vignan Thanugundla; Sri Condoor; Nadeem Parkar; Saar Danon; Wilson King
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 3.  3-dimensional printing for anterior cervical surgery: a review.

Authors:  Wen Jie Choy; William C H Parr; Kevin Phan; William R Walsh; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12

4.  Design of mulitlevel OLF approach ("V"-shaped decompressive laminoplasty) based on 3D printing technology.

Authors:  Qinjie Ling; Erxing He; Hanbin Ouyang; Jing Guo; Zhixun Yin; Wenhua Huang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Application of a 3D custom printed patient specific spinal implant for C1/2 arthrodesis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Alessandro Sgro; Monish M Maharaj; Paul D'Urso; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-12

Review 6.  Current status of 3D printing in spine surgery.

Authors:  Bhavuk Garg; Nishank Mehta
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-08-07

Review 7.  Systematic review of 3D printing in spinal surgery: the current state of play.

Authors:  Ben Wilcox; Ralph J Mobbs; Ai-Min Wu; Kevin Phan
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-09

8.  Personalised modified osteotomy using computer-aided design-rapid prototyping to correct thoracic deformities.

Authors:  Jin Cheng Yang; Xiang Yang Ma; Jun Lin; Zeng Hui Wu; Kai Zhang; Qing Shui Yin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  3D printed anatomical (bio)models in spine surgery: clinical benefits and value to health care providers.

Authors:  William C H Parr; Joshua L Burnard; Peter John Wilson; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12

10.  Medical 3D Printing Cost-Savings in Orthopedic and Maxillofacial Surgery: Cost Analysis of Operating Room Time Saved with 3D Printed Anatomic Models and Surgical Guides.

Authors:  David H Ballard; Patrick Mills; Richard Duszak; Jeffery A Weisman; Frank J Rybicki; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.