Literature DB >> 16371915

Biomodeling as an aid to spinal instrumentation.

Paul S D'Urso1, Owen D Williamson, Robert G Thompson.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective trial.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a new method of spinal stereotaxy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Biomodeling has been found to be helpful for complex skeletal surgery. Frameless stereotaxy has been used for spinal surgery but has significant limitations. A novel stereotactic technique using biomodels has been developed.
METHODS: Twenty patients with complex spinal disorders requiring instrumentation were recruited. A three-dimensional CT scan of their spine was performed, and the data were transferred via a DICOM network to a computer workstation. ANATOMICS BIOBUILD software was used to generate the code required to manufacture exact acrylate biomodels of each spine using rapid prototyping. The biomodels were used to obtain informed consent from patients and to simulate surgery. Simulation was performed using a standard power drill to place trajectory pins into the spinal biomodel. Acrylate drill guides were manufactured using the biomodels and trajectory pins as templates. The biomodels and drill guides were sterilized and used intraoperatively to assist with surgical navigation and the placement of instrumentation.
RESULTS: The biomodels were found to be highly accurate and of great assistance in the planning and execution of the surgery. The ability to drill optimum screw trajectories into the biomodel and then accurately replicate the trajectory was judged especially helpful. Accurate screw placement was confirmed with postoperative CT scanning. The design of the first two templates was suboptimal as the contact surface area was too great and complex. Approximately 20 minutes was spent before surgery preparing each biomodel and template. Operating time was reduced, as less reliance on intraoperative radiograph was necessary. Patients stated that the biomodels improved informed consent.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors have developed a novel method of spinal stereotaxy using exact plastic copies of the spine manufactured using biomodeling technology. Biomodel spinal stereotaxy is a simple and accurate technique that may have advantages over frameless stereotaxy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16371915     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000190886.56895.3d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  21 in total

Review 1.  Stereolithographic bone scaffold design parameters: osteogenic differentiation and signal expression.

Authors:  Kyobum Kim; Andrew Yeatts; David Dean; John P Fisher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 2.  3-dimensional printing for anterior cervical surgery: a review.

Authors:  Wen Jie Choy; William C H Parr; Kevin Phan; William R Walsh; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12

3.  Application of a 3D custom printed patient specific spinal implant for C1/2 arthrodesis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Alessandro Sgro; Monish M Maharaj; Paul D'Urso; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-12

Review 4.  Cervical screw placement using rapid prototyping drill templates for navigation: a literature review.

Authors:  Teng Lu; Chao Liu; Jun Dong; Meng Lu; Haopeng Li; Xijing He
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Clinical application of computer-designed polystyrene models in complex severe spinal deformities: a pilot study.

Authors:  Keya Mao; Yan Wang; Songhua Xiao; Zhengsheng Liu; Yonggang Zhang; Xuesong Zhang; Zheng Wang; Ning Lu; Zhu Shourong; Zhang Xifeng; Cui Geng; Liu Baowei
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Systematic review of 3D printing in spinal surgery: the current state of play.

Authors:  Ben Wilcox; Ralph J Mobbs; Ai-Min Wu; Kevin Phan
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-09

7.  Personalised modified osteotomy using computer-aided design-rapid prototyping to correct thoracic deformities.

Authors:  Jin Cheng Yang; Xiang Yang Ma; Jun Lin; Zeng Hui Wu; Kai Zhang; Qing Shui Yin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  3D printed anatomical (bio)models in spine surgery: clinical benefits and value to health care providers.

Authors:  William C H Parr; Joshua L Burnard; Peter John Wilson; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12

9.  Multimaterial 3D printing preoperative planning for frontoethmoidal meningoencephalocele surgery.

Authors:  Giselle Coelho; Thailane Marie Feitosa Chaves; Ademil Franco Goes; Emilio C Del Massa; Osmar Moraes; Maurício Yoshida
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  Teaching facial fracture repair: A novel method of surgical skills training using three-dimensional biomodels.

Authors:  Neil D'Souza; James Mainprize; Glenn Edwards; Paul Binhammer; Oleh Antonyshyn
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.