Literature DB >> 32043006

3D printed anatomical (bio)models in spine surgery: clinical benefits and value to health care providers.

William C H Parr1,2,3, Joshua L Burnard1,3, Peter John Wilson4, Ralph J Mobbs1,3,4.   

Abstract

The applications of three-dimensional printing (3DP) for clinical purposes have grown rapidly over the past decade. Recent advances include the fabrication of patient specific instrumentation, such as drill and cutting guides, patient specific/custom long term implants and 3DP of cellular scaffolds. Spine surgery in particular has seen enthusiastic early adoption of these applications. 3DP as a manufacturing method can be used to mass produce objects of the same design, but can also be used as a cost-effective method for manufacturing unique one-off objects, such as patient specific models and devices. Perhaps the first, and currently most widespread, application of 3DP for producing patient specific devices is the production of patient specific anatomical models, often termed biomodels. The present manuscript focuses on the current state of the art in anatomical (bio)models as used in spinal clinical practice. The biomodels shown and discussed include: translucent and coloured models to aid in identification of extent and margins of pathologies such as bone tumours; dynamic models for implant trial implantation and pre-operative sizing; models that can be disassembled to simulate surgical resection of diseased tissue and subsequent reconstruction. Biomodels can reduce risk to the patient by decreasing surgery time, reducing the probability of the surgical team encountering unexpected anatomy or relative positioning of structures and/or devices, and better pre-operative planning of the surgical workflow including ordered preparation of the necessary instrumentation for multi-step and revision procedures. Conversely, risks can be increased if biomodels are not accurate representations of the anatomy, which can occur if MRI/CT scan data is simply converted into 3DP format without interpretation of what the scan represents in terms of patient anatomy. A review and analysis of the cost-benefits of biomodels shows that biomodels can potentially reduce cost to health care providers if operating room time is reduced by 14 minutes or more. 2019 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing (3DP); biomodel; computational anatomy; custom; patient specific

Year:  2019        PMID: 32043006      PMCID: PMC6989927          DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.12.07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  43 in total

1.  Traffic flow in the operating room: an explorative and descriptive study on air quality during orthopedic trauma implant surgery.

Authors:  Annette Erichsen Andersson; Ingrid Bergh; Jón Karlsson; Bengt I Eriksson; Kerstin Nilsson
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 2.918

2.  Toward integration of geometric morphometrics and computational biomechanics: new methods for 3D virtual reconstruction and quantitative analysis of Finite Element Models.

Authors:  W C H Parr; S Wroe; U Chamoli; H S Richards; M R McCurry; P D Clausen; C McHenry
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Current and Projected Uses.

Authors:  C Lee Ventola
Journal:  P T       Date:  2014-10

4.  Influence of Scan Resolution, Thresholding, and Reconstruction Algorithm on Computed Tomography-Based Kinematic Measurements.

Authors:  Christopher John Tan; William C H Parr; William R Walsh; Mariano Makara; Kenneth A Johnson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Application of a 3D custom printed patient specific spinal implant for C1/2 arthrodesis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Alessandro Sgro; Monish M Maharaj; Paul D'Urso; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-12

6.  The Effect of Cervical Interbody Cage Morphology, Material Composition, and Substrate Density on Cage Subsidence.

Authors:  Paul B Suh; Christian Puttlitz; Chad Lewis; B Sonny Bal; Kirk McGilvray
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Development of a Customized Interbody Fusion Device for Treatment of Canine Disc-Associated Cervical Spondylomyelopathy.

Authors:  Michelle R Joffe; William C H Parr; Christopher Tan; William R Walsh; Laurencie Brunel
Journal:  Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 1.358

8.  A novel patient-specific navigational template for cervical pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Sheng Lu; Yong Q Xu; William W Lu; Guo X Ni; Yan B Li; Ji H Shi; Dong P Li; Guo P Chen; Yu B Chen; Yuan Z Zhang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Computer simulations show that Neanderthal facial morphology represents adaptation to cold and high energy demands, but not heavy biting.

Authors:  Stephen Wroe; William C H Parr; Justin A Ledogar; Jason Bourke; Samuel P Evans; Luca Fiorenza; Stefano Benazzi; Jean-Jacques Hublin; Chris Stringer; Ottmar Kullmer; Michael Curry; Todd C Rae; Todd R Yokley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Philip Tack; Jan Victor; Paul Gemmel; Lieven Annemans
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  6 in total

1.  Cervical myelopathy in a patient with Klippel-Feil syndrome treated with a patient-specific custom cervical spine locking plate.

Authors:  Taylor J Jackson; Brett A Freedman; Jonathan M Morris; Bradford L Currier; Ahmad Nassr
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2022-01-14

2.  Virtual Reality in Preoperative Planning of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery Using Google Cardboard.

Authors:  Sergio De Salvatore; Gianluca Vadalà; Leonardo Oggiano; Fabrizio Russo; Luca Ambrosio; Pier Francesco Costici
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2021-03-31

3.  Robotic Replica of a Human Spine Uses Soft Magnetic Sensor Array to Forecast Intervertebral Loads and Posture after Surgery.

Authors:  Maohua Lin; Moaed A Abd; Alex Taing; Chi-Tay Tsai; Frank D Vrionis; Erik D Engeberg
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 4.  Anatomical Engineering and 3D Printing for Surgery and Medical Devices: International Review and Future Exponential Innovations.

Authors:  José Cornejo; Jorge A Cornejo-Aguilar; Mariela Vargas; Carlos G Helguero; Rafhael Milanezi de Andrade; Sebastian Torres-Montoya; Javier Asensio-Salazar; Alvaro Rivero Calle; Jaime Martínez Santos; Aaron Damon; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa; Miguel D Quintero-Consuegra; Juan Pablo Umaña; Sebastian Gallo-Bernal; Manolo Briceño; Paolo Tripodi; Raul Sebastian; Paul Perales-Villarroel; Gabriel De la Cruz-Ku; Travis Mckenzie; Victor Sebastian Arruarana; Jiakai Ji; Laura Zuluaga; Daniela A Haehn; Albit Paoli; Jordan C Villa; Roxana Martinez; Cristians Gonzalez; Rafael J Grossmann; Gabriel Escalona; Ilaria Cinelli; Thais Russomano
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Application of three-dimensional reconstruction technology combined with three-dimensional printing in the treatment of pectus excavatum.

Authors:  Yibo Shan; Guiping Yu; Yi Lu; Hao Kong; Xuewei Jiang; Zhiming Shen; Fei Sun; Hongcan Shi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 2.535

6.  Custom-made artificial eyes using 3D printing for dogs: A preliminary study.

Authors:  So-Young Park; Jeong-Hee An; Hyun Kwon; Seo-Young Choi; Ka-Young Lim; Ho-Hyun Kwak; Kamal Hany Hussein; Heung-Myong Woo; Kyung-Mee Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.