Literature DB >> 10188125

Stereolithographic biomodelling in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a prospective trial.

P S D'Urso1, T M Barker, W J Earwaker, L J Bruce, R L Atkinson, M W Lanigan, J F Arvier, D J Effeney.   

Abstract

Stereolithographic (SL) biomodelling is a new technology that allows three-dimensional (3-D) computed tomography (CT) data to be used to manufacture solid plastic replicas of anatomical structures (biomodels). A prospective trial with the objective of assessing the utility of biomodelling in complex surgery has been performed. Forty-five patients with craniofacial, maxillofacial, skull base cervical spinal pathology were selected. 3-D CT or MR scanning was performed and the data of interest were edited and converted into a form acceptable to the rapid prototyping technology SL. The data were used to guide a laser to selectively polymerize photosensitive resin to manufacture biomodels. The biomodels were used by surgeons for patient education, diagnosis and operative planning. An assessment protocol was used to test the hypothesis that 'biomodels in addition to standard imaging had greater utility in the surgery performed than the standard imaging alone'. Biomodels significantly improved operative planning (images 44.09%, images with biomodel 82.21%, P < .01) and diagnosis (images 65.63%, images with biomodel 95.23%, P < .01). Biomodels were found to improve measurement accuracy significantly (image measurement error 44.14%, biomodel measurement error 7.91%, P < .05). Surgeons estimated that the use of biomodels reduced operating time by a mean of 17.63% and were cost effective at a mean price of $1031 AUS. Patients found the biomodels to be helpful for informed consent (images 63.53%, biomodels 88.54%, P < .001). Biomodelling is an intuitive, user-friendly technology that facilitated diagnosis and operative planning. Biomodels allowed surgeons to rehearse procedures readily and improved communication between colleagues and patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10188125     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-5182(99)80007-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  46 in total

1.  3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications.

Authors:  F Rengier; A Mehndiratta; H von Tengg-Kobligk; C M Zechmann; R Unterhinninghofen; H-U Kauczor; F L Giesel
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  Medical 3D Printing for the Radiologist.

Authors:  Dimitris Mitsouras; Peter Liacouras; Amir Imanzadeh; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Tianrun Cai; Kanako K Kumamaru; Elizabeth George; Nicole Wake; Edward J Caterson; Bohdan Pomahac; Vincent B Ho; Gerald T Grant; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Applications of three-dimensional printing technology in the cardiovascular field.

Authors:  Di Shi; Kai Liu; Xin Zhang; Hang Liao; Xiaoping Chen
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 4.  Crouzon syndrome: Genetic and intervention review.

Authors:  N M Al-Namnam; F Hariri; M K Thong; Z A Rahman
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2018-08-29

Review 5.  Current status of 3D printing in spine surgery.

Authors:  Bhavuk Garg; Nishank Mehta
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-08-07

Review 6.  Three-dimensional Printing and 3D Slicer: Powerful Tools in Understanding and Treating Structural Lung Disease.

Authors:  George Z Cheng; Raul San Jose Estepar; Erik Folch; Jorge Onieva; Sidhu Gangadharan; Adnan Majid
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 7.  Systematic review of 3D printing in spinal surgery: the current state of play.

Authors:  Ben Wilcox; Ralph J Mobbs; Ai-Min Wu; Kevin Phan
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-09

8.  Use of a Three-Dimensional Model to Optimize a MEDPOR Implant for Delayed Reconstruction of a Suprastructure Maxillectomy Defect.

Authors:  Anthony Echo; Erik M Wolfswinkel; William Weathers; Aisha McKnight; Shayan Izaddoost
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2013-09-26

9.  Medical 3D Printing Cost-Savings in Orthopedic and Maxillofacial Surgery: Cost Analysis of Operating Room Time Saved with 3D Printed Anatomic Models and Surgical Guides.

Authors:  David H Ballard; Patrick Mills; Richard Duszak; Jeffery A Weisman; Frank J Rybicki; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  [Rapid prototyping in planning reconstructive surgery of the head and neck. Review and evaluation of indications in clinical use].

Authors:  J S Bill; J F Reuther
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2004-03-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.