Literature DB >> 23538945

Exact confidence interval estimation for the difference in diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups.

Lili Tian1, Chengjie Xiong, Chin-Ying Lai, Albert Vexler.   

Abstract

In the cases with three ordinal diagnostic groups, the important measures of diagnostic accuracy are the volume under surface (VUS) and the partial volume under surface (PVUS) which are the extended forms of the area under curve (AUC) and the partial area under curve (PAUC). This article addresses confidence interval estimation of the difference in paired VUS s and the difference in paired PVUS s. To focus especially on studies with small to moderate sample sizes, we propose an approach based on the concepts of generalized inference. A Monte Carlo study demonstrates that the proposed approach generally can provide confidence intervals with reasonable coverage probabilities even at small sample sizes. The proposed approach is compared to a parametric bootstrap approach and a large sample approach through simulation. Finally, the proposed approach is illustrated via an application to a data set of blood test results of anemia patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic accuracy; Generalized pivot; Generalized test variable; Receiver operating characteristic (ROC); curve

Year:  2010        PMID: 23538945      PMCID: PMC3607387          DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2010.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference        ISSN: 0378-3758            Impact factor:   1.111


  28 in total

1.  Exact inference for growth curves with intraclass correlation structure.

Authors:  S Weerahandi; V W Berger
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Determining a range of false-positive rates for which ROC curves differ.

Authors:  D K McClish
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1990 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Analyzing a portion of the ROC curve.

Authors:  D K McClish
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1989 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.

Authors:  Chi-Rong Li; Chen-Tuo Liao; Jen-Pei Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  ROC analysis with multiple classes and multiple tests: methodology and its application in microarray studies.

Authors:  Jialiang Li; Jason P Fine
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  Comparison of ROC umbrella volumes with an application to the assessment of lung cancer diagnostic markers.

Authors:  Todd A Alonzo; Christos T Nakas
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.207

7.  Three-way ROCs.

Authors:  D Mossman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  On the statistical analysis of ROC curves.

Authors:  M L Thompson; W Zucchini
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Discriminating between iron deficiency anemia and anemia of chronic disease using traditional indices of iron status vs transferrin receptor concentration.

Authors:  F H Wians; J E Urban; J H Keffer; S H Kroft
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.493

10.  Maximum likelihood ratio tests for comparing the discriminatory ability of biomarkers subject to limit of detection.

Authors:  Albert Vexler; Aiyi Liu; Ekaterina Eliseeva; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 1.701

View more
  6 in total

1.  Parametric and non-parametric confidence intervals of the probability of identifying early disease stage given sensitivity to full disease and specificity with three ordinal diagnostic groups.

Authors:  Tuochuan Dong; Lili Tian; Alan Hutson; Chengjie Xiong
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Estimating confidence intervals for the difference in diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic categories without a gold standard.

Authors:  Le Kang; Chengjie Xiong; Lili Tian
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.681

3.  Confidence Interval Estimation for Sensitivity to the Early Diseased Stage Based on Empirical Likelihood.

Authors:  Tuochuan Dong; Lili Tian
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 1.051

4.  Density-based empirical likelihood procedures for testing symmetry of data distributions and K-sample comparisons.

Authors:  Albert Vexler; Hovig Tanajian; Alan D Hutson
Journal:  Stata J       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.637

5.  Confidence interval estimation of the difference between two sensitivities to the early disease stage.

Authors:  Tuochuan Dong; Le Kang; Alan Hutson; Chengjie Xiong; Lili Tian
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.207

6.  Diagnostic thresholds with three ordinal groups.

Authors:  Kristopher Attwood; Lili Tian; Chengjie Xiong
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.051

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.