Literature DB >> 22139763

Parametric and non-parametric confidence intervals of the probability of identifying early disease stage given sensitivity to full disease and specificity with three ordinal diagnostic groups.

Tuochuan Dong1, Lili Tian, Alan Hutson, Chengjie Xiong.   

Abstract

In practice, there exist many disease processes with three ordinal disease classes, that is, the non-diseased stage, the early disease stage, and the fully diseased stage. Because early disease stage is likely the best time window for treatment interventions, it is important to have diagnostic tests that have good diagnostic ability to discriminate the early disease stage from the other two stages. In this paper, we present both parametric and non-parametric approaches for confidence interval estimation of probability of detecting early disease stage given the true classification rates for non-diseased group and diseased group, namely, the specificity and the sensitivity to full disease. We analyze a data set on the clinical diagnosis of early-stage Alzheimer's disease from the neuropsychological database at the Washington University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center using the proposed approaches.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22139763      PMCID: PMC4263350          DOI: 10.1002/sim.4401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  26 in total

1.  Exact inference for growth curves with intraclass correlation structure.

Authors:  S Weerahandi; V W Berger
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Inferences on the common mean of several normal populations based on the generalized variable method.

Authors:  K Krishnamoorthy; Yong Lu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  A new approach for interval estimation and hypothesis testing of a certain intraclass correlation coefficient: the generalized variable method.

Authors:  Lili Tian; Joseph C Cappelleri
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  ROC analysis for markers with mass at zero.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Benjamin Reiser; David Faraggi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.

Authors:  Chi-Rong Li; Chen-Tuo Liao; Jen-Pei Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Comparison of ROC umbrella volumes with an application to the assessment of lung cancer diagnostic markers.

Authors:  Todd A Alonzo; Christos T Nakas
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.207

7.  Confidence intervals for P(Y1>Y2) with normal outcomes in linear models.

Authors:  Lili Tian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Three-way ROCs.

Authors:  D Mossman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests.

Authors:  K H Zou; W J Hall; D E Shapiro
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  A parametric comparison of diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups.

Authors:  Chengjie Xiong; Gerald van Belle; J Philip Miller; Yan Yan; Feng Gao; Kai Yu; John C Morris
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.207

View more
  5 in total

1.  Confidence Interval Estimation for Sensitivity to the Early Diseased Stage Based on Empirical Likelihood.

Authors:  Tuochuan Dong; Lili Tian
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 1.051

2.  Empirical likelihood confidence interval for sensitivity to the early disease stage.

Authors:  Husneara Rahman; Yichuan Zhao
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 1.234

3.  Confidence interval estimation of the difference between two sensitivities to the early disease stage.

Authors:  Tuochuan Dong; Le Kang; Alan Hutson; Chengjie Xiong; Lili Tian
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.207

4.  Diagnostic thresholds with three ordinal groups.

Authors:  Kristopher Attwood; Lili Tian; Chengjie Xiong
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.051

5.  The performance of hemoglobin A1c against fasting plasma glucose and oral glucose tolerance test in detecting prediabetes and diabetes.

Authors:  Jale Karakaya; Safak Akin; Ergun Karagaoglu; Alper Gurlek
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.852

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.