Literature DB >> 17760483

Measuring the quality of life of youth with facial differences.

Donald L Patrick1, Tari D Topolski, Todd C Edwards, Cassandra L Aspinall, Kathleen A Kapp-Simon, Nichola J Rumsey, Ronald P Strauss, Christopher R Thomas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the Facial Differences Module of the Youth Quality of Life Instruments (YQOL-FD) and present results evaluating domain structure, internal consistency, reproducibility, validity, and respondent burden.
DESIGN: A multisite observational study of youth aged 11 to 18 years with acquired or congenital facial differences. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred seven youth recruited through clinics at four U.S. sites and one U.K. site. Eligible youth were aged 11 to 18 years, had a noticeable facial difference, could read at the fifth-grade level, and, for youth with facial burns, were at least 2 years posttrauma. MEASURES: Included were the newly developed YQOL-FD, the generic Youth Quality of Life Instrument, the Children's Depression Inventory, and demographics.
RESULTS: Principal components analysis showed five significant factors that closely matched the domain structure hypothesized a priori. Domain scores of the YQOL-FD showed acceptable internal consistency and reproducibility. Scores were more strongly correlated with the Children's Depression Inventory score than with self-rating of health as predicted. All domain scores showed adequate discrimination among levels of general quality of life (Wilks lambda = 0.84, p = .001). The median time to complete the module was 10 minutes. DISCUSSION: The YQOL Facial Differences Module augmented information obtained from the generic YQOL measure by addressing specific concerns. The module was well received by youth and showed acceptable measurement properties for evaluating the perceived quality-of-life status of youth facial differences. Future use in longitudinal studies and clinical trials is anticipated to evaluate the ability to detect change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17760483     DOI: 10.1597/06-072.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  15 in total

Review 1.  Oral health-related quality of life: what, why, how, and future implications.

Authors:  L Sischo; H L Broder
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Body Image and Quality of Life in Adolescents With Craniofacial Conditions.

Authors:  Canice E Crerand; David B Sarwer; Anne E Kazak; Alexandra Clarke; Nichola Rumsey
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2016-01-11

3.  Nasoalveolar molding: prevalence of cleft centers offering NAM and who seeks it.

Authors:  Lacey Sischo; Jenny W Chan; Margot Stein; Christie Smith; John van Aalst; Hillary L Broder
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2011-07-08

4.  Shared Surgical Decision Making and Youth Resilience Correlates of Satisfaction With Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Kathleen A Kapp-Simon; Todd Edwards; Caroline Ruta; Claudia Crilly Bellucci; Cassandra L Aspirnall; Ronald P Strauss; Tari D Topolski; Nichola J Rumsey; Donald L Patrick
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.046

5.  Oral health-related quality of life in youth receiving cleft-related surgery: self-report and proxy ratings.

Authors:  Hillary L Broder; Maureen Wilson-Genderson; Lacey Sischo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Caregiver-Reported Outcomes and Barriers to Care among Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate.

Authors:  Katelyn G Bennett; Kavitha Ranganathan; Anne K Patterson; Michaella K Baker; Christian J Vercler; Steven J Kasten; Steven R Buchman; Jennifer F Waljee
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  The impact of orofacial clefts on quality of life and healthcare use and costs.

Authors:  G L Wehby; C H Cassell
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 3.511

8.  Evaluation of the similarities and differences in response patterns to the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory and the Child Oral Health Impact Scores among youth with cleft.

Authors:  Hillary L Broder; Robert G Norman; Lacey Sischo; Maureen Wilson-Genderson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Examination of a theoretical model for oral health-related quality of life among youths with cleft.

Authors:  Hillary L Broder; Maureen Wilson-Genderson; Lacey Sischo
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Sex differences in perceived stigmatization, body image disturbance, and satisfaction with facial appearance and speech among adolescents with craniofacial conditions.

Authors:  Canice E Crerand; Nichola Rumsey; Anne Kazak; Alexandra Clarke; Joseph Rausch; David B Sarwer
Journal:  Body Image       Date:  2020-01-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.