Literature DB >> 21740168

Nasoalveolar molding: prevalence of cleft centers offering NAM and who seeks it.

Lacey Sischo1, Jenny W Chan, Margot Stein, Christie Smith, John van Aalst, Hillary L Broder.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Nasoalveolar molding (NAM) is a treatment option available for early cleft care. Despite the growing debate about the efficacy of nasoalveolar molding, questions remain regarding its prevalence and the demographic characteristics of families undergoing this technique prior to traditional cleft surgery.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the number of teams currently offering nasoalveolar molding and to identify salient clinical and sociodemographic variables in infants and families who choose nasoalveolar molding compared with those who choose traditional cleft care across three well-established cleft centers.
RESULTS: Via phone surveys, 89% of the U.S. cleft teams contacted revealed that nasoalveolar molding is available at 37% of these centers. Chart reviews and phone correspondence with caregivers indicate that the average distance to the cleft center was 65.5 miles and caregiver age averaged 30.9 ± 5.7 years. Of families who chose nasoalveolar molding, 85% received total or partial insurance coverage. No difference in caregiver education, income, or distance to the clinic between treatment groups was found. On average, infants receiving nasoalveolar molding and cleft surgery had larger clefts and had more clinic visits than infants receiving traditional cleft surgery. Infants who were firstborn and those who did not have other siblings were more likely to receive nasoalveolar molding than were infants who were residing with other siblings.
CONCLUSIONS: Currently more than one-third of U.S. cleft centers offer nasoalveolar molding. Although the cleft size was larger in the nasoalveolar molding group, no treatment group differences in education, income, and distance to the clinic were found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21740168      PMCID: PMC3358428          DOI: 10.1597/11-053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  30 in total

1.  Qualitative approaches in craniofacial research.

Authors:  Pauline A Nelson
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2008-10-27

Review 2.  Relating parent and family functioning to the psychological adjustment of children with chronic health conditions: what have we learned? What do we need to know?

Authors:  D Drotar
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  1997-04

3.  Parameters for evaluation and treatment of patients with cleft lip/palate or other craniofacial anomalies. American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. March, 1993.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1993-03

4.  Long-term effects of nasoalveolar molding on three-dimensional nasal shape in unilateral clefts.

Authors:  D J Maull; B H Grayson; C B Cutting; L L Brecht; F L Bookstein; D Khorrambadi; J A Webb; D J Hurwitz
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1999-09

5.  Long-term comparison of four techniques for obtaining nasal symmetry in unilateral complete cleft lip patients: a single surgeon's experience.

Authors:  Chun-Shin Chang; Yong Chen Por; Eric Jein-Wein Liou; Chee-Jen Chang; Philip Kuo-Ting Chen; M Samuel Noordhoff
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Costs of medically treated craniofacial conditions.

Authors:  Cecelia B Snowden; Ted R Miller; Alan F Jensen; Bruce A Lawrence
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Correction of the alveolar gap and nostril deformity by presurgical passive orthodontia in the unilateral cleft lip.

Authors:  Marcos Jaeger; Jefferson Braga-Silva; Daniel Gehlen; Yuki Sato; Ronald Zuker; David Fisher
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  Nasoalveolar molding improves appearance of children with bilateral cleft lip-cleft palate.

Authors:  Catherine T H Lee; Judah S Garfinkle; Stephen M Warren; Lawrence E Brecht; Court B Cutting; Barry H Grayson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 9.  Gingivoperiosteoplasty as well as early palatal cleft closure is unproductive.

Authors:  Samuel Berkowitz
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.046

10.  Oral health-related cultural beliefs for four racial/ethnic groups: Assessment of the literature.

Authors:  Yogita Butani; Jane A Weintraub; Judith C Barker
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 2.757

View more
  17 in total

1.  Surgeon's and Caregivers' Appraisals of Primary Cleft Lip Treatment with and without Nasoalveolar Molding: A Prospective Multicenter Pilot Study.

Authors:  Hillary L Broder; Roberto L Flores; Sean Clouston; Richard E Kirschner; Judah S Garfinkle; Lacey Sischo; Ceib Phillips
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Active Presurgical Infant Orthopedics for Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Intercenter Outcome Comparison of Latham, Modified McNeil, and Nasoalveolar Molding.

Authors:  Michelle Kornbluth; Richard E Campbell; John Daskalogiannakis; Elizabeth J Ross; Patricia H Glick; Kathleen A Russell; Jean-Charles Doucet; Ronald R Hathaway; Ross E Long; Thomas J Sitzman
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2018-02-20

3.  Assessment of presurgical clefts and predicted surgical outcome in patients treated with and without nasoalveolar molding.

Authors:  Marcie S Rubin; Sean Clouston; Mohammad M Ahmed; Kristen M Lowe; Pradip R Shetye; Hillary L Broder; Stephen M Warren; Barry H Grayson
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Obstetrician-Gynecologists' Knowledge and Awareness on Nasoalveolar Molding in Newborns with Cleft Lip and Palate.

Authors:  Kevser Kurt Demirsoy; Semi Çalış; Süleyman Kutalmış Büyük
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2022-03

5.  Caregiver responses to early cleft palate care: A mixed method approach.

Authors:  Lacey Sischo; Sean A P Clouston; Ceib Phillips; Hillary L Broder
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Coping With Cleft: A Conceptual Framework of Caregiver Responses to Nasoalveolar Molding.

Authors:  Lacey Sischo; Hillary L Broder; Ceib Phillips
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2014-09-16

7.  Nasal outcomes of presurgical nasal molding in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Emily M Williams; Carla A Evans; David J Reisberg; Ellen A Begole
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-09-11

8.  Nasoalveolar molding in cleft care--experience in 40 patients from a single centre in Germany.

Authors:  Andrea Rau; Lucas M Ritschl; Thomas Mücke; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Denys J Loeffelbein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A modified presurgical orthopedic (nasoalveolar molding) device in the treatment of unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Chitravelu Siva Subramanian; N K K Koteswara Prasad; Arun B Chitharanjan; Eric Jein Wein Liou
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

10.  Stress Distribution Patterns within Viscero- and Neurocranium during Nasoalveolar Molding: a Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Lucas M Ritschl; Veronika Heinrich; Florian D Grill; Maximilian Roth; Dennis M Hedderich; Andrea Rau; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Franz X Bauer; Denys J Loeffelbein
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.