Literature DB >> 30489528

Caregiver-Reported Outcomes and Barriers to Care among Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate.

Katelyn G Bennett1, Kavitha Ranganathan1, Anne K Patterson1, Michaella K Baker1, Christian J Vercler1, Steven J Kasten1, Steven R Buchman1, Jennifer F Waljee1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For children with cleft lip and/or palate, access to care is vital for optimizing speech, appearance, and psychosocial outcomes. The authors posited that inadequate access to care negatively impacts outcomes in this population.
METHODS: Sixty caregivers of children with cleft lip and palate were surveyed to assess perceived barriers using the validated Barriers to Care questionnaire. The questionnaire includes 39 items divided into five subscales, with higher scores indicating fewer barriers. Caregiver-reported outcomes were assessed using the Cleft Evaluation Profile, which captures cleft-specific appearance- and speech-related outcomes. Higher scores correspond to less satisfactory outcomes. Desire for revision surgery was assessed as a binary outcome among caregivers. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the relationship of barriers to care, caregiver-reported outcomes, and desire for revision, adjusting for clinical and demographic covariates.
RESULTS: Sixty percent of caregivers perceived barriers to care, and caregivers who reported poorer access to care described poorer cleft-related outcomes (r = 0.19, p = 0.024). Caregivers with poorer skills (r = 0.17, p = 0.037), expectations (r = 0.17, p = 0.045), and pragmatics (r = 0.18, p = 0.026) subscale scores were associated with worse Cleft Evaluation Profile scores. Barriers were also negatively associated with aesthetic item scores (r = 0.11, p = 0.025). Finally, caregivers reporting fewer barriers were 21.2 percent less likely to express interest in revision surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to care were associated with poorer appearance-related outcomes and increased interest in revision among caregivers of cleft patients. Enhancing access to care is critical in order to effectively meet goals of care for these families.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30489528      PMCID: PMC6282168          DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  42 in total

1.  Coordinating care--a perilous journey through the health care system.

Authors:  Thomas Bodenheimer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Patient-Reported Outcomes - Harnessing Patients' Voices to Improve Clinical Care.

Authors:  Ethan Basch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Inpatient versus outpatient cleft lip repair and alveolar bone grafting: a cost analysis.

Authors:  Mark Graham Albert; Oksana Olegovna Babchenko; Janice Fay Lalikos; Douglas Miller Rothkopf
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  Care coordination impacts on access to care for children with special health care needs enrolled in Medicaid and CHIP.

Authors:  Kipyn Miller
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-05

5.  Multidisciplinary care of the child born with cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  P C Thomas
Journal:  ORL Head Neck Nurs       Date:  2000

6.  Familial Caregiver and Physician Perceptions of the Family-Physician Interactions During Interfacility Transfers.

Authors:  Jennifer L Rosenthal; Su-Ting T Li; Lenore Hernandez; Michelle Alvarez; Roberta S Rehm; Megumi J Okumura
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2017-06

Review 7.  The multidisciplinary evaluation and management of cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Nathaniel H Robin; Heather Baty; Judith Franklin; Fran C Guyton; Judith Mann; Audie L Woolley; Peter D Waite; John Grant
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.954

8.  The Role of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Value-Based Payment Reform.

Authors:  Lee Squitieri; Kevin J Bozic; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 5.725

9.  Measuring the quality of life of youth with facial differences.

Authors:  Donald L Patrick; Tari D Topolski; Todd C Edwards; Cassandra L Aspinall; Kathleen A Kapp-Simon; Nichola J Rumsey; Ronald P Strauss; Christopher R Thomas
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2007-09

10.  Electronic-Based Patient-Reported Outcomes: Willingness, Needs, and Barriers in Adjuvant and Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Andreas D Hartkopf; Joachim Graf; Elisabeth Simoes; Lucia Keilmann; Nina Sickenberger; Paul Gass; Diethelm Wallwiener; Lina Matthies; Florin-Andrei Taran; Michael P Lux; Stephanie Wallwiener; Eric Belleville; Christof Sohn; Peter A Fasching; Andreas Schneeweiss; Sara Y Brucker; Markus Wallwiener
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2017-08-07
View more
  3 in total

1.  Isolation, Uncertainty and Treatment Delays: Parents' Experiences of Having a Baby with Cleft Lip/Palate During the Covid-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Bruna Costa; Danielle McWilliams; Sabrina Blighe; Nichola Hudson; Matthew Hotton; Marc C Swan; Nicola Marie Stock
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2021-11-29

2.  Resilience and Related Factors: A Comparison of Fathers and Mothers of Patients With Cleft Lip and/or Palate in China.

Authors:  Lulu Yuan; Yuqin Gao; Bochen Pan; Junyan Wang; Yanjie Wang; Caixia Gong; Weiren Wang; Xiaohan Li
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.157

3.  Barriers and Resources to Cleft Lip and Palate Speech Services Globally: A Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Miriam Baigorri; Catherine J Crowley; Chelsea L Sommer; Gemma Moya-Galé
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 1.172

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.