Literature DB >> 1774546

Risk-sensitive foraging theory and operant psychology.

A I Houston1.   

Abstract

Hastjarjo, Silberberg, and Hursh (1990) have presented data on the foraging behavior of rats and discussed it in terms of risk-sensitive foraging theory. Because risk-sensitive foraging theory is comprised of several different models, it does not lead to general predictions about when an organism should prefer a foraging option with high variance to a foraging option with low variance. Any comparison of data with the predictions of the theory must be based on an appropriate model. I draw attention to various experiments that are potentially relevant to the results reported by Hastjarjo et al. and show how the time period over which the organism must survive can influence a model's predictions about risk sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1774546      PMCID: PMC1323140          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  6 in total

1.  APERIODICITY AS A FACTOR IN CHOICE.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Risky choice as a function of amount and variance in food supply.

Authors:  T Hastjarjo; A Silberberg; S R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A general framework for understanding the effects of variability and interruptions on foraging behaviour.

Authors:  J M McNamara; A I Houston
Journal:  Acta Biotheor       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.774

6.  On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  6 in total
  11 in total

1.  Risk-sensitive choice in humans as a function of an earnings budget.

Authors:  C J Pietras; T D Hackenberc
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Pigeons' preference for variable-interval water reinforcement under widely varied water budgets.

Authors:  D A Case; P Nichols; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Sick-building syndrome fatigue as a possible predation defense.

Authors:  A C Chester
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  1995 Jan-Mar

4.  Patrimony and the evolution of risk-taking.

Authors:  Michael D Stern
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Risk-sensitivity in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Arne J Nagengast; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Foraging behavior under starvation conditions is altered via photosynthesis by the marine gastropod, Elysia clarki.

Authors:  Michael L Middlebrooks; Sidney K Pierce; Susan S Bell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Risk sensitivity as an evolutionary adaptation.

Authors:  Arend Hintze; Randal S Olson; Christoph Adami; Ralph Hertwig
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  State dependent valuation: the effect of deprivation on risk preferences.

Authors:  Dino J Levy; Amalie C Thavikulwat; Paul W Glimcher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Adaptation in bacterial flagellar and motility systems: from regulon members to 'foraging'-like behavior in E. coli.

Authors:  Kai Zhao; Mingzhu Liu; Richard R Burgess
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  Intersection of effort and risk: ethological and neurobiological perspectives.

Authors:  Mike A Miller; Alexander Thomé; Stephen L Cowen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.