Literature DB >> 3113143

A general framework for understanding the effects of variability and interruptions on foraging behaviour.

J M McNamara, A I Houston.   

Abstract

A general framework for analysing the effects of variability and the effects of interruptions on foraging is presented. The animal is characterised by its level of energetic reserves, x. We consider behaviour over a period of time [O,T]. A terminal reward function R(x) determines the expected future reproductive success of an animal with reserves x at time T. For any state x at a time in the period, we give the animal a choice between various options and then constrain it to follow a background strategy. The best option is the one that maximizes expected future reproductive success. Using this framework, we show that sensitivity to variability in amount of energy gained is logically distinct from sensitivity to variability in the time at which food is obtained. We also show that incorporating interruptions results in both a preference for variability in time and a preference for a reward followed by a delay as opposed to the same delay before the reward.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3113143     DOI: 10.1007/bf00159228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biotheor        ISSN: 0001-5342            Impact factor:   1.774


  16 in total

1.  DECISION MAKING BY RATS: UNCERTAIN OUTCOME CHOICES.

Authors:  F A LOGAN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1965-04

2.  Discrete-trial choice in pigeons: Effects of reinforcer magnitude.

Authors:  J S Young
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules: number of component intervals.

Authors:  M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice and the relative immediacy of reinforcement.

Authors:  R Dunn; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.

Authors:  E L Charnov
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  Constant versus variable delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  B H PUBOLS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1962-02

7.  On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  On the optimality of coarse behavior rules.

Authors:  R Bookstaber; J Langsam
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1985-09-21       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  The application of statistical decision theory to animal behaviour.

Authors:  J McNamara; A Houston
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1980-08-21       Impact factor: 2.691

10.  Caste and ecology in the social insects.

Authors:  G F Oster; E O Wilson
Journal:  Monogr Popul Biol       Date:  1978
View more
  15 in total

1.  Risk-sensitive choice in humans as a function of an earnings budget.

Authors:  C J Pietras; T D Hackenberc
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Evolutionary models of metabolism, behaviour and personality.

Authors:  Alasdair I Houston
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Risk-sensitive foraging theory and operant psychology.

Authors:  A I Houston
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 4.  Time discounting and time preference in animals: A critical review.

Authors:  Benjamin Y Hayden
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

Review 5.  Uncertainty processing in bees exposed to free choices: Lessons from vertebrates.

Authors:  Patrick Anselme
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

6.  Impulsiveness without discounting: the ecological rationality hypothesis.

Authors:  David W Stephens; Benjamin Kerr; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Social influences of competition on impulsive choices in domestic chicks.

Authors:  Hidetoshi Amita; Ai Kawamori; Toshiya Matsushima
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Discrimination, discounting and impulsivity: a role for an informational constraint.

Authors:  David W Stephens
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Human risky choice under temporal constraints: tests of an energy-budget model.

Authors:  Cynthia J Pietras; Matthew L Locey; Timothy D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Pigeons' preference for variable-interval water reinforcement under widely varied water budgets.

Authors:  D A Case; P Nichols; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.