Literature DB >> 17726404

Viewpoint: developing a research ethics consultation service to foster responsive and responsible clinical research.

Inmaculada de Melo-Martín1, Larry I Palmer, Joseph J Fins.   

Abstract

Although clinical ethics has become a central, and welcome, component of the health care landscape, research ethics consultation services are still uncommon. Indeed, the usual approach to ethical concerns in research with human subjects has been primarily a regulatory one. Nonetheless, ethical problems also arise in the context of research and thus collaborations between investigators and research ethicists are as essential as those between physicians and clinical ethicists. The authors argue that the use of research ethics consultation services can be of benefit to clinical scientists, bioethicists, research institutions, and research subjects. Such services can increase sensitivity among researchers to the ethical implications of their work, result in better institutional research policies, and facilitate the development of an organizational culture that is receptive to the identification and resolution of ethical conflicts. The authors conclude by describing the process of development and implementation of such a research ethics consultation service at Weill Medical College of Cornell University.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17726404     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318132f0ee

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  15 in total

1.  Toward a better bioethics: commentary on "Forbidding science: some beginning reflections".

Authors:  Jason Scott Robert
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Strangers at the benchside: research ethics consultation.

Authors:  Mildred K Cho; Sara L Tobin; Henry T Greely; Jennifer McCormick; Angie Boyce; David Magnus
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  Integrating ethics for the nation's health.

Authors:  Lisa M Lee
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  The Ethical Challenges of Socially Responsible Science.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Kevin C Elliott
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 5.  Research ethics consultation: ethical and professional practice challenges and recommendations.

Authors:  Richard R Sharp; Holly A Taylor; Margaret A Brinich; Mary M Boyle; Mildred Cho; Marilyn Coors; Marion Danis; Molly Havard; David Magnus; Benjamin Wilfond
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Building a Central Repository for Research Ethics Consultation Data: A Proposal for a Standard Data Collection Tool.

Authors:  Mildred K Cho; Holly Taylor; Jennifer B McCormick; Nick Anderson; David Barnard; Mary B Boyle; Alexander M Capron; Elizabeth Dorfman; Kathryn Havard; Carson Reider; John Sadler; Peter Schwartz; Richard R Sharp; Marion Danis; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.689

7.  The establishment of research ethics consultation services (RECS): an emerging research resource.

Authors:  Jennifer B McCormick; Richard R Sharp; Abigale L Ottenberg; Carson R Reider; Holly A Taylor; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 4.689

8.  Barriers to Considering Ethical and Societal Implications of Research: Perceptions of Life Scientists.

Authors:  Jennifer Blair McCormick; Angie M Boyce; Jennifer M Ladd; Mildred Cho
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2012-06-19

9.  Research ethics consultation: the Stanford experience.

Authors:  Mildred K Cho; Sara L Tobin; Henry T Greely; Jennifer McCormick; Angie Boyce; David Magnus
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec

10.  An informatics-based tool to assist researchers in initiating research at an academic medical center: Vanderbilt Customized Action Plan.

Authors:  Jill M Pulley; Paul A Harris; Tonya Yarbrough; Jonathan Swafford; Terri Edwards; Gordon R Bernard
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.893

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.