Literature DB >> 26193168

The Ethical Challenges of Socially Responsible Science.

David B Resnik1, Kevin C Elliott2.   

Abstract

Social responsibility is an essential part of the responsible conduct of research that presents difficult ethical questions for scientists. Recognizing one's social responsibilities as a scientist is an important first step toward exercising social responsibility, but it is only the beginning, since scientists may confront difficult value questions when deciding how to act responsibly. Ethical dilemmas related to socially responsible science fall into at least three basic categories: 1) dilemmas related to problem selection, 2) dilemmas related to publication and data sharing, and 3) dilemmas related to engaging society. In responding to these dilemmas, scientists must decide how to balance their social responsibilities against other professional commitments and how to avoid compromising their objectivity. In this article, we will examine the philosophical and ethical basis of social responsibility in science, discuss some of the ethical dilemmas related to exercising social responsibility, and make five recommendations to help scientists deal with these issues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ethics; objectivity; politics; scientific research; social responsibility; values

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26193168      PMCID: PMC4631672          DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2014.1002608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Account Res        ISSN: 0898-9621            Impact factor:   2.622


  24 in total

1.  Setting biomedical research priorities: justice, science, and public participation.

Authors:  D Resnik
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2001-06

2.  What did the Asilomar exercise accomplish, what did it leave undone?

Authors:  M Singer
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.416

3.  Scientific freedom and responsibility.

Authors:  John T Edsall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-05-16       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The social responsibilities of biological scientists.

Authors:  Stanley Joel Reiser; Ruth Ellen Bulger
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Teaching social responsibility: the Manhattan project. Commentary on "The Six Domains of Research".

Authors:  Penny J Gilmer; Michael DuBois
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 6.  Six domains of research ethics. A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  Kenneth D Pimple
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Should we make a fuss? A case for social responsibility in science.

Authors:  Jon Beckwith; Franklin Huang
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  An ethics of expertise based on informed consent.

Authors:  Kevin C Elliott
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Social responsibility and research ethics in community-driven studies of industrialized hog production.

Authors:  Steve Wing
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Objectivity and ethics in environmental health science.

Authors:  Steve Wing
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  8 in total

1.  From a variety of ethics to the integrity and congruence of research on biodiversity conservation.

Authors:  Claire Lajaunie
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2018-12-27

2.  Research Ethics 2.0: New Perspectives on Norms, Values, and Integrity in Genomic Research in Times of Even Scarcer Resources.

Authors:  Caroline Brall; Els Maeckelberghe; Rouven Porz; Jihad Makhoul; Peter Schröder-Bäck
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 3.  The Culture of Biosafety, Biosecurity, and Responsible Conduct in the Life Sciences: A Comprehensive Literature Review.

Authors:  Dana Perkins; Kathleen Danskin; A Elise Rowe; Alicia A Livinski
Journal:  Appl Biosaf       Date:  2019-03-01

4.  Genes do not operate in a vacuum, and neither should our research.

Authors:  Daphne Oluwaseun Martschenko; Markia Smith
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Progressive research collaborations and the limits of soft power.

Authors:  Olga Kits; Camille Angus; Anna MacLeod; Jonathan Tummons
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2019-02

6.  "CRISPR for Disabilities: How to Self-Regulate" or Something?

Authors:  Amanda Courtright-Lim
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 7.  Ethical Issues in Research: Perceptions of Researchers, Research Ethics Board Members and Research Ethics Experts.

Authors:  Marie-Josée Drolet; Eugénie Rose-Derouin; Julie-Claude Leblanc; Mélanie Ruest; Bryn Williams-Jones
Journal:  J Acad Ethics       Date:  2022-08-12

Review 8.  Ethics and Law in Research on Algorithmic and Data-Driven Technology in Mental Health Care: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Piers Gooding; Timothy Kariotis
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2021-06-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.