Literature DB >> 23399088

The establishment of research ethics consultation services (RECS): an emerging research resource.

Jennifer B McCormick1, Richard R Sharp, Abigale L Ottenberg, Carson R Reider, Holly A Taylor, Benjamin S Wilfond.   

Abstract

Emphasis on translational research to facilitate progression from the laboratory into the community also creates a dynamic in which ethics and social policy questions and solutions are ever pressing. In response, academic institutions are creating Research Ethics Consultation Services (RECS). All Clinical Translational Science Award institutions were surveyed in early 2010 to determine which institutions have a RECS in operation and what is their composition and function. Of the 46 institutions surveyed, 33 (70%) have a RECS. Only 15 RECS have received any consult requests in the last year. Issues that are common among these relatively nascent services include relationships with institutional oversight committees, balancing requestor concerns about confidentiality with research integrity and human subjects protection priorities, tracking consult data and outcomes, and developing systems for internal evaluation. There is variability in how these issues are approached. It will be important to be attentive to the institutional context to develop an appropriate approach. Further data about the issues raised by requestors and the recommendations provided are necessary to build a community of scholars who can navigate and resolve ethical issues encountered along the translational research pathway.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23399088      PMCID: PMC3573851          DOI: 10.1111/cts.12008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Sci        ISSN: 1752-8054            Impact factor:   4.689


  15 in total

1.  Triggers for research ethics consultation.

Authors:  Molly Havard; Mildred K Cho; David Magnus
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Ethical dilemmas encountered by clinical researchers.

Authors:  Gordon DuVal; Gary Gensler; Marion Danis
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  2005

Review 3.  The uneasy ethical and legal underpinnings of large-scale genomic biobanks.

Authors:  Henry T Greely
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 8.929

4.  Ethics. Incidental findings in brain imaging research.

Authors:  Judy Illes; Matthew P Kirschen; Emmeline Edwards; L R Stanford; Peter Bandettini; Mildred K Cho; Paul J Ford; Gary H Glover; Jennifer Kulynych; Ruth Macklin; Daniel B Michael; Susan M Wolf
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Viewpoint: developing a research ethics consultation service to foster responsive and responsible clinical research.

Authors:  Inmaculada de Melo-Martín; Larry I Palmer; Joseph J Fins
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Sharing data and experience: using the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) "moral community" to improve research ethics consultation.

Authors:  Maureen Kelley; Kelly Fryer-Edwards; Stephanie M Fullerton; Thomas H Gallagher; Benjamin Wilfond
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 11.229

7.  Strangers at the benchside: research ethics consultation.

Authors:  Mildred K Cho; Sara L Tobin; Henry T Greely; Jennifer McCormick; Angie Boyce; David Magnus
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 11.229

8.  Research Ethics Consultation at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Authors:  Holly A Taylor; Nancy E Kass
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr

9.  Points to consider: The research ethics consultation service and the IRB.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Christine Grady; Ana S Iltis; John Z Sadler; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec

10.  Mapping the inputs, analyses, and outputs of biobank research systems to identify sources of incidental findings and individual research results for potential return to participants.

Authors:  Heather R Bemmels; Susan M Wolf; Brian Van Ness
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  14 in total

1.  Professionalism and ethics in animal research.

Authors:  Nikola Biller-Andorno; Herwig Grimm; Rebecca L Walker
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Insiders and Outsiders: Lessons for Neuroethics from the History of Bioethics.

Authors:  Winston Chiong
Journal:  AJOB Neurosci       Date:  2020 Jul-Sep

3.  The Challenges of Incorporating Research Ethics Consultation Into Institutional Human Subjects Protections Programs.

Authors:  Erin Talati Paquette; Lainie Ross
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  Beyond Open Communication: A Call for Partnership Between Clinical Ethics and Research Ethics Committees.

Authors:  Hae Lin Cho; David Gibbes Miller; Christine Grady
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  The Emergence of Clinical Research Ethics Consultation: Insights From a National Collaborative.

Authors:  Kathryn M Porter; Marion Danis; Holly A Taylor; Mildred K Cho; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 11.229

6.  Human-subjects research: The ethics squad.

Authors:  Elie Dolgin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Conflicts of Interest and Distribution of Resources to Community Partners: An Organizational Ethics Dilemma.

Authors:  Allison M Cole; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Gina A Keppel; Ellen Kuwana; Brenda L Mollis; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2017

Review 8.  Research ethics consultation: ethical and professional practice challenges and recommendations.

Authors:  Richard R Sharp; Holly A Taylor; Margaret A Brinich; Mary M Boyle; Mildred Cho; Marilyn Coors; Marion Danis; Molly Havard; David Magnus; Benjamin Wilfond
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Creating a Research Ethics Consultation Service: Issues to Consider.

Authors:  Holly A Taylor; Kathryn M Porter; Erin Talati Paquette; Jennifer B McCormick; Emma Tumilty; Jason F Arnold; Kayte Spector-Bagdady; Marion Danis; Debra Brandt; Jina Shah; Benjamin S Wilfond; Lisa M Lee
Journal:  Ethics Hum Res       Date:  2021-09

10.  Building a Central Repository for Research Ethics Consultation Data: A Proposal for a Standard Data Collection Tool.

Authors:  Mildred K Cho; Holly Taylor; Jennifer B McCormick; Nick Anderson; David Barnard; Mary B Boyle; Alexander M Capron; Elizabeth Dorfman; Kathryn Havard; Carson Reider; John Sadler; Peter Schwartz; Richard R Sharp; Marion Danis; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.689

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.