Literature DB >> 18570086

Strangers at the benchside: research ethics consultation.

Mildred K Cho1, Sara L Tobin, Henry T Greely, Jennifer McCormick, Angie Boyce, David Magnus.   

Abstract

Institutional ethics consultation services for biomedical scientists have begun to proliferate, especially for clinical researchers. We discuss several models of ethics consultation and describe a team-based approach used at Stanford University in the context of these models. As research ethics consultation services expand, there are many unresolved questions that need to be addressed, including what the scope, composition, and purpose of such services should be, whether core competencies for consultants can and should be defined, and how conflicts of interest should be mitigated. We make preliminary recommendations for the structure and process of research ethics consultation, based on our initial experiences in a pilot program.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18570086      PMCID: PMC2585006          DOI: 10.1080/15265160802132951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


  38 in total

1.  Policy forum: genetics. Ethical considerations in synthesizing a minimal genome.

Authors:  M K Cho; D Magnus; A L Caplan; D McGee
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The business ethics of bioethics consulting.

Authors:  T Donaldson
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

3.  Too much ethics, not enough medicine: clarifying the role of clinical expertise for the clinical ethics consultant.

Authors:  C H Braddock; M R Tonelli
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  2001

4.  Clinical pragmatism: a method of moral problem solving.

Authors:  Joseph J Fins; Matthew D Bacchetta; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  1997-06

Review 5.  What are the goals of ethics consultation? A consensus statement.

Authors:  J C Fletcher; M Siegler
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  1996

Review 6.  Conflict of interest and institutional review boards.

Authors:  M K Cho; P Billings
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Genetic information and the workplace: legislative approaches and policy changes.

Authors:  K Rothenberg; B Fuller; M Rothstein; T Duster; M J Ellis Kahn; R Cunningham; B Fine; K Hudson; M C King; P Murphy; G Swergold; F Collins
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-21       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Impact of pediatric ethics consultations on patients, families, social workers, and physicians.

Authors:  B M Yen; L J Schneiderman
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.521

9.  Health care ethics consultation: nature, goals, and competencies. A position paper from the Society for Health and Human Values-Society for Bioethics Consultation Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation.

Authors:  M P Aulisio; R M Arnold; S J Youngner
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-07-04       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Evaluation of an ethics consultation service: patient and family perspective.

Authors:  R D Orr; K R Morton; D M deLeon; J C Fals
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  25 in total

1.  The Emergence of Clinical Research Ethics Consultation: Insights From a National Collaborative.

Authors:  Kathryn M Porter; Marion Danis; Holly A Taylor; Mildred K Cho; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  Toward a better bioethics: commentary on "Forbidding science: some beginning reflections".

Authors:  Jason Scott Robert
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Our two cents: research ethics consultation at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Authors:  Holly A Taylor; Nancy E Kass
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  Research ethics consultation at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  Integrating ethics for the nation's health.

Authors:  Lisa M Lee
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Does science need bioethicists? Ethics and science collaboration in biomedical research.

Authors:  Angeliki Kerasidou; Michael Parker
Journal:  Res Ethics       Date:  2014-12-01

7.  Building a Central Repository for Research Ethics Consultation Data: A Proposal for a Standard Data Collection Tool.

Authors:  Mildred K Cho; Holly Taylor; Jennifer B McCormick; Nick Anderson; David Barnard; Mary B Boyle; Alexander M Capron; Elizabeth Dorfman; Kathryn Havard; Carson Reider; John Sadler; Peter Schwartz; Richard R Sharp; Marion Danis; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.689

8.  Research Ethics Consultation at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Authors:  Holly A Taylor; Nancy E Kass
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr

9.  Strategies to Guide the Return of Genomic Research Findings: An Australian Perspective.

Authors:  Lisa Eckstein; Margaret Otlowski
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 1.352

10.  The establishment of research ethics consultation services (RECS): an emerging research resource.

Authors:  Jennifer B McCormick; Richard R Sharp; Abigale L Ottenberg; Carson R Reider; Holly A Taylor; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 4.689

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.