Literature DB >> 25758372

Building a Central Repository for Research Ethics Consultation Data: A Proposal for a Standard Data Collection Tool.

Mildred K Cho1, Holly Taylor2, Jennifer B McCormick3, Nick Anderson4, David Barnard5, Mary B Boyle6, Alexander M Capron7, Elizabeth Dorfman8, Kathryn Havard9, Carson Reider10, John Sadler11, Peter Schwartz12, Richard R Sharp3, Marion Danis13, Benjamin S Wilfond8,14.   

Abstract

Clinical research ethics consultation services have been established across academic health centers over the past decade. This paper presents the results of collaboration within the CTSA consortium to develop a standard approach to the collection of research ethics consultation information to serve as a foundation for quality improvement, education, and research efforts. This approach includes categorizing and documenting descriptive information about the requestor, research project, the ethical question, the consult process, and describing the basic structure for a consult note. This paper also explores challenges in determining how to share some of this information between collaborating institutions related to concerns about confidentially, data quality, and informatics. While there is much still to be learned to improve the process of clinical research ethics consultation, these tools can advance these efforts, which, in turn, can facilitate the ethical conduct of research.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDA; biostatistics; consultation; ethics; quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25758372      PMCID: PMC4888071          DOI: 10.1111/cts.12268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Sci        ISSN: 1752-8054            Impact factor:   4.689


  10 in total

1.  Triggers for research ethics consultation.

Authors:  Molly Havard; Mildred K Cho; David Magnus
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Viewpoint: developing a research ethics consultation service to foster responsive and responsible clinical research.

Authors:  Inmaculada de Melo-Martín; Larry I Palmer; Joseph J Fins
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Our two cents: research ethics consultation at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Authors:  Holly A Taylor; Nancy E Kass
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  Sharing data and experience: using the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) "moral community" to improve research ethics consultation.

Authors:  Maureen Kelley; Kelly Fryer-Edwards; Stephanie M Fullerton; Thomas H Gallagher; Benjamin Wilfond
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  Strangers at the benchside: research ethics consultation.

Authors:  Mildred K Cho; Sara L Tobin; Henry T Greely; Jennifer McCormick; Angie Boyce; David Magnus
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 11.229

6.  From strangers to partners: emerging forms of research ethics consultation.

Authors:  Michele A Carter; Susan S Night
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 11.229

7.  Research Ethics Consultation at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Authors:  Holly A Taylor; Nancy E Kass
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr

8.  The establishment of research ethics consultation services (RECS): an emerging research resource.

Authors:  Jennifer B McCormick; Richard R Sharp; Abigale L Ottenberg; Carson R Reider; Holly A Taylor; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 4.689

9.  Points to consider: The research ethics consultation service and the IRB.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Christine Grady; Ana S Iltis; John Z Sadler; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec

10.  Biomedical scientists' perceptions of ethical and social implications: is there a role for research ethics consultation?

Authors:  Jennifer B McCormick; Angie M Boyce; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  The Challenges of Incorporating Research Ethics Consultation Into Institutional Human Subjects Protections Programs.

Authors:  Erin Talati Paquette; Lainie Ross
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  The Emergence of Clinical Research Ethics Consultation: Insights From a National Collaborative.

Authors:  Kathryn M Porter; Marion Danis; Holly A Taylor; Mildred K Cho; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  Conflicts of Interest and Distribution of Resources to Community Partners: An Organizational Ethics Dilemma.

Authors:  Allison M Cole; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Gina A Keppel; Ellen Kuwana; Brenda L Mollis; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2017

4.  Creating a Research Ethics Consultation Service: Issues to Consider.

Authors:  Holly A Taylor; Kathryn M Porter; Erin Talati Paquette; Jennifer B McCormick; Emma Tumilty; Jason F Arnold; Kayte Spector-Bagdady; Marion Danis; Debra Brandt; Jina Shah; Benjamin S Wilfond; Lisa M Lee
Journal:  Ethics Hum Res       Date:  2021-09

5.  Strategies to Guide the Return of Genomic Research Findings: An Australian Perspective.

Authors:  Lisa Eckstein; Margaret Otlowski
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 1.352

6.  Research ethics consultation: an attempt and 5-year experience in a Japanese University Hospital.

Authors:  Hiroaki Yanagawa; Rumi Katashima; Chiho Sato; Kenshi Takechi; Hiroshi Nokihara; Chikako Kane; Masayuki Chuma; Yuki Aoe
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-09-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.