Literature DB >> 9330425

Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests.

K H Zou1, W J Hall, D E Shapiro.   

Abstract

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves have seen increasing use to assess the accuracy of diagnostic tests that yield continuous test results. We can calculate a fully non-parametric ROC curve from the empirical false positive rate (FPR) and true positive rate (TPR) at each possible decision threshold, but it may be quite jagged. We can obtain a smooth ROC curve by directly fitting a parameteric model, for example, binormal or bilogistic, to the actual test results, but substantial lack-of-fit may result if the distributional assumptions are not valid. A recently proposed alternative algorithm 'LABROC4' is insensitive to such departures, but is not fully flexible in that the form of the resulting ROC curve is restricted to be binormal. We propose a smooth non-parametric ROC curve derived from kernel density estimates of the two test result distributions. We obtain pointwise standard errors for the estimated TPR at each FPR and use them to construct pointwise confidence intervals for the ROC curve, using a logit transformation. We also obtain standard errors for the estimated TPR and FPR at given thresholds and use them to construct confidence rectangles in (FPR, TPR)-space that correspond to a specific threshold. We adapt existing methods for the unsmoothed non-parametric ROC curve to obtain the area under the ROC curve and its standard error; we also give partial areas and corresponding standard errors. We have created a FORTRAN algorithm 'ROC-&-ROL', available upon request. We compare ROC curves and areas obtained by applying our methods and its competitors to two data sets, one of which is fit well by parametric methods and LABROC4, the other of which is not.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9330425     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19971015)16:19<2143::aid-sim655>3.0.co;2-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  45 in total

1.  Comparing two correlated C indices with right-censored survival outcome: a one-shot nonparametric approach.

Authors:  Le Kang; Weijie Chen; Nicholas A Petrick; Brandon D Gallas
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Parametric and non-parametric confidence intervals of the probability of identifying early disease stage given sensitivity to full disease and specificity with three ordinal diagnostic groups.

Authors:  Tuochuan Dong; Lili Tian; Alan Hutson; Chengjie Xiong
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Homogeneity tests of clustered diagnostic markers with applications to the BioCycle Study.

Authors:  Liansheng Larry Tang; Aiyi Liu; Enrique F Schisterman; Xiao-Hua Zhou; Catherine Chun-Ling Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Semiparametric Inference for ROC Curves with Censoring.

Authors:  Hua Liang; Yong Zhou
Journal:  Scand Stat Theory Appl       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 1.396

5.  Bayesian multivariate hierarchical transformation models for ROC analysis.

Authors:  A James O'Malley; Kelly H Zou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Nonparametric sequential evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers.

Authors:  Aiyi Liu; Chengqing Wu; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Estimation of ROC curves based on stably distributed biomarkers subject to measurement error and pooling mixtures.

Authors:  Albert Vexler; Enrique F Schisterman; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Prospective comparison of MR with diffusion-weighted imaging, endoscopic ultrasound, MDCT and positron emission tomography-CT in the pre-operative staging of oesophageal cancer: results from a pilot study.

Authors:  Francesco Giganti; Alessandro Ambrosi; Maria C Petrone; Carla Canevari; Damiano Chiari; Annalaura Salerno; Paolo G Arcidiacono; Roberto Nicoletti; Luca Albarello; Elena Mazza; Francesca Gallivanone; Luigi Gianolli; Elena Orsenigo; Antonio Esposito; Carlo Staudacher; Alessandro Del Maschio; Francesco De Cobelli
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Three validation metrics for automated probabilistic image segmentation of brain tumours.

Authors:  Kelly H Zou; William M Wells; Ron Kikinis; Simon K Warfield
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  An additive selection of markers to improve diagnostic accuracy based on a discriminatory measure.

Authors:  Liansheng Larry Tang; Le Kang; Chunling Liu; Enrique F Schisterman; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.