Literature DB >> 25688028

Connecting Past with Present: A Mixed-Methods Science Ethics Course and its Evaluation.

Ioanna Semendeferi1, Panagiotis Tsiamyrtzis2, Malcolm Dcosta3, Ioannis Pavlidis4.   

Abstract

We present a graduate science ethics course that connects cases from the historical record to present realities and practices in the areas of social responsibility, authorship, and human/animal experimentation. This content is delivered with mixed methods, including films, debates, blogging, and practicum; even the instructional team is mixed, including a historian of science and a research scientist. What really unites all of the course's components is the experiential aspect: from acting in historical debates to participating in the current scientific enterprise. The course aims to change the students' culture into one deeply devoted to the science ethics cause. To measure the sought after cultural change, we developed and validated a relevant questionnaire. Results of this questionnaire from students who took the course, demonstrate that the course had the intended effect on them. Furthermore, results of this questionnaire from controls indicate the need for cultural change in that cohort. All these quantitative results are reinforced by qualitative outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cultural transformation; Emotions; History of science; Moral motivation; Moral sensitivity; Questionnaire; Science culture; Science ethics; Science ethics course

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25688028     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-015-9626-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  14 in total

1.  Case-based knowledge and ethics education: improving learning and transfer through emotionally rich cases.

Authors:  Chase E Thiel; Shane Connelly; Lauren Harkrider; Lynn D Devenport; Zhanna Bagdasarov; James F Johnson; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Authorship and publication practices: evaluation of the effect of responsible conduct of research instruction to postdoctoral trainees.

Authors:  Carolyn L Funk; Kirsten A Barrett; Francis L Macrina
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Sean T Powell; Matthew A Allison; Michael W Kalichman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Judging the past. The case of the human radiation experiments.

Authors:  A Buchanan
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.683

5.  Investigation: revelations about Three Mile Island disaster raise doubts over nuclear plant safety: a special facing south investigation by Sue Sturgis.

Authors:  Sue Sturgis
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  2009

6.  Misconduct is the main cause of life-sciences retractions.

Authors:  Zoë Corbyn
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  A quantitative perspective on ethics in large team science.

Authors:  Alexander M Petersen; Ioannis Pavlidis; Ioanna Semendeferi
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Evaluating the effects that existing instruction on responsible conduct of research has on ethical decision making.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Xiaoqian Wang; Michael D Mumford; Ryan P Brown; Shane Connelly; Lynn D Devenport
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  The CITI program: an international online resource for education in human subjects protection and the responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  Paul Braunschweiger; Kenneth W Goodman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Research ethics. Aligning regulations and ethics in human research.

Authors:  Rebecca Dresser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.