Literature DB >> 18520469

The development and assessment of an NIH-funded research ethics training program.

James M DuBois1, Jeffrey M Dueker, Emily E Anderson, Jean Campbell.   

Abstract

In an effort to increase the number of researchers with skills "in identifying and addressing the ethical, legal, and social implications of their research," the National Institutes of Health (NIH) solicited training grant proposals from 1999 to 2004 and subsequently funded approved programs. The authors describe the content, format, and outcomes of one such training program that ran from 2002 to 2006 and share key lessons learned about program formats and assessment methods. Jointly developed by the Saint Louis University Center for Health Care Ethics and the Missouri Institute of Mental Health Continuing Education department, the training program focused on mental health research and adopted a train-the-trainer model. It was offered in on-site and distance-learning formats. Key outcomes of the program included educational products (such as 70 case studies posted on the course Web site, a textbook, and an instructional DVD) and program completion by 40 trainees. Assessment involved pre- and posttesting focused on knowledge of research ethics, ethical problem-solving skills, and levels of confidence in addressing ethical issues in mental health research. The program succeeded in increasing participants' knowledge of ethical issues and their beliefs that they could identify issues, identify problem-solving resources, and solve ethical problems. However, scores on the case-based problem-solving assessment dropped in posttesting, apparently because of diminished confidence about the right course of action in the specific dilemma presented; the implications of this finding for ethics assessment are discussed. Overall satisfaction was high, and dropout rates were low but three times higher for distance-learners than for on-site participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18520469      PMCID: PMC4474180          DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181723095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  7 in total

1.  Public health ethics: mapping the terrain.

Authors:  James F Childress; Ruth R Faden; Ruth D Gaare; Lawrence O Gostin; Jeffrey Kahn; Richard J Bonnie; Nancy E Kass; Anna C Mastroianni; Jonathan D Moreno; Phillip Nieburg
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  The defining issues test and the four component model: contributions to professional education.

Authors:  Muriel J Bebeau
Journal:  J Moral Educ       Date:  2002-09

3.  Can students' reasons for choosing set answers to ethical vignettes be reliably rated? Development and testing of a method.

Authors:  John Goldie; Lisa Schwartz; Alex McConnachie; Brian Jolly; Jillian Morrison
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.650

4.  Using our best judgment in conducting human research.

Authors:  Joan E Sieber
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2004

5.  Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Sean T Powell; Matthew A Allison; Michael W Kalichman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Measuring dental students' ethical sensitivity.

Authors:  M J Bebeau; J R Rest; C M Yamoor
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  The impact of a dental ethics curriculum on moral reasoning.

Authors:  M J Bebeau; S J Thoma
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.264

  7 in total
  15 in total

1.  Perceived impact of human subjects protection training on community partners in community-based participatory research.

Authors:  Nancy C Hawley; Mark L Wieland; Jennifer A Weis; Irene G Sia
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2014

2.  Are Ethics Training Programs Improving? A Meta-Analytic Review of Past and Present Ethics Instruction in the Sciences.

Authors:  Logan L Watts; Kelsey E Medeiros; Tyler J Mulhearn; Logan M Steele; Shane Connelly; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2016-05-27

Review 3.  Review of Instructional Approaches in Ethics Education.

Authors:  Tyler J Mulhearn; Logan M Steele; Logan L Watts; Kelsey E Medeiros; Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach.

Authors:  E Michelle Todd; Logan L Watts; Tyler J Mulhearn; Brett S Torrence; Megan R Turner; Shane Connelly; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Instruction in the responsible conduct of research: an inventory of programs and materials within CTSAs.

Authors:  James M DuBois; Debie A Schilling; Elizabeth Heitman; Nicholas H Steneck; Alexander A Kon
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.689

6.  Biomedical ethics education may benefit from integrating compliance and analysis approaches.

Authors:  Michael D Mumford; Logan L Watts; Kelsey E Medeiros; Tyler J Mulhearn; Logan M Steele; Shane Connelly
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 25.606

7.  Developing community partner training: regulations and relationships.

Authors:  Stephanie Solomon; Patricia J Piechowski
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Five Dimensions of Research Ethics: A Stakeholder Framework for Creating a Climate of Research Integrity.

Authors:  James M DuBois; Alison L Antes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Education of research ethics for clinical investigators with Moodle tool.

Authors:  Arja Halkoaho; Mari Matveinen; Ville Leinonen; Kirsi Luoto; Tapani Keränen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  An evaluation of a data linkage training workshop for research ethics committees.

Authors:  Kate M Tan; Felicity S Flack; Natasha L Bear; Judy A Allen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.