Literature DB >> 31710408

Input-Output Functions in Human Heads Obtained With Cochlear Implant and Transcranial Electric Stimulation.

Phillip Tran1, Matthew L Richardson1, Fan-Gang Zeng1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Electric stimulation is used to treat a number of neurologic disorders such as epilepsy and depression. However, delivering the required current to far-field neural targets is often ineffective because of current spread through low-impedance pathways. Here, the specific aims are to develop an empirical measure for current passing through the human head and to optimize stimulation strategies for targeting deeper structures, including the auditory nerve, by utilizing the cochlear implant (CI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Outward input/output (I/O) functions were obtained by CI stimulation and recording scalp potentials in five CI subjects. Conversely, inward I/O functions were obtained by noninvasive transcranial electric stimulation (tES) and recording intracochlear potentials using the onboard recording capability of the CI.
RESULTS: I/O measures indicate substantial current spread, with a maximum of 2.2% gain recorded at the inner ear target during tES (mastoid-to-mastoid electrode configuration). Similarly, CI stimulation produced a maximum of 1.1% gain at the scalp electrode nearest the CI return electrode. Gain varied with electrode montage according to a point source model that accounted for distances between the stimulating and recording electrodes. Within the same electrode montages, current gain patterns varied across subjects suggesting the importance of tissue properties, geometry, and electrode positioning.
CONCLUSION: These results provide a novel objective measure of electric stimulation in the human head, which can help to optimize stimulation parameters that improve neural excitation of deep structures by reducing the influence of current spread. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
© 2019 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Back-telemetry; Cochlear implant; Current spread; Electroencephalogram; Transcranial alternating-current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31710408      PMCID: PMC8059363          DOI: 10.1111/ner.13065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  49 in total

1.  Spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Qing Tang; Raul Benítez; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Analysis of the quasi-static approximation for calculating potentials generated by neural stimulation.

Authors:  Chad A Bossetti; Merrill J Birdno; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Electric field distribution in a finite-volume head model of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Peadar F Grant; Madeleine M Lowery
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target.

Authors:  Jacek P Dmochowski; Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson; Yuzhuo Su; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander Opitz; Walter Paulus; Susanne Will; Andre Antunes; Axel Thielscher
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Development of HEATHER for cochlear implant stimulation using a new modeling workflow.

Authors:  Phillip Tran; Andrian Sue; Paul Wong; Qing Li; Paul Carter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 7.  Advances in cochlear implant telemetry: evoked neural responses, electrical field imaging, and technical integrity.

Authors:  Lucas H M Mens
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-09

8.  Direct current stimulation of the ear in tinnitus treatment: a double-blind placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Marzena Mielczarek; Jurek Olszewski
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 9.  Adverse events of tDCS and tACS: A review.

Authors:  Hideyuki Matsumoto; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2016-12-21

Review 10.  High-Resolution Multi-Scale Computational Model for Non-Invasive Cervical Vagus Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Antonios P Mourdoukoutas; Dennis Q Truong; Devin K Adair; Bruce J Simon; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-10-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.