Literature DB >> 16920343

AutoNR: an automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant via machine intelligence.

Andrew Botros1, Bas van Dijk, Matthijs Killian.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: AutoNRT is an automated system that measures electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) thresholds from the auditory nerve with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant. ECAP thresholds along the electrode array are useful in objectively fitting cochlear implant systems for individual use. This paper provides the first detailed description of the AutoNRT algorithm and its expert systems, and reports the clinical success of AutoNRT to date.
METHODS: AutoNRT determines thresholds by visual detection, using two decision tree expert systems that automatically recognise ECAPs. The expert systems are guided by a dataset of 5393 neural response measurements. The algorithm approaches threshold from lower stimulus levels, ensuring recipient safety during postoperative measurements. Intraoperative measurements use the same algorithm but proceed faster by beginning at stimulus levels much closer to threshold. When searching for ECAPs, AutoNRT uses a highly specific expert system (specificity of 99% during training, 96% during testing; sensitivity of 91% during training, 89% during testing). Once ECAPs are established, AutoNRT uses an unbiased expert system to determine an accurate threshold. Throughout the execution of the algorithm, recording parameters (such as implant amplifier gain) are automatically optimised when needed.
RESULTS: In a study that included 29 intraoperative and 29 postoperative subjects (a total of 418 electrodes), AutoNRT determined a threshold in 93% of cases where a human expert also determined a threshold. When compared to the median threshold of multiple human observers on 77 randomly selected electrodes, AutoNRT performed as accurately as the 'average' clinician.
CONCLUSIONS: AutoNRT has demonstrated a high success rate and a level of performance that is comparable with human experts. It has been used in many clinics worldwide throughout the clinical trial and commercial launch of Nucleus Custom Sound Suite, significantly streamlining the clinical procedures associated with cochlear implant use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16920343     DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2006.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Intell Med        ISSN: 0933-3657            Impact factor:   5.326


  17 in total

Review 1.  The development of the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear implant system.

Authors:  James F Patrick; Peter A Busby; Peter J Gibson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-12

2.  Maps created using a new objective procedure (C-NRT) correlate with behavioral, loudness-balanced maps: a study in adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Alessandro Scorpecci; Alessandra D'Elia; Paolo Malerba; Italo Cantore; Patrizia Consolino; Franco Trabalzini; Gaetano Paludetti; Nicola Quaranta
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  A Comparison of Alternating Polarity and Forward Masking Artifact-Reduction Methods to Resolve the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.

Authors:  Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Michelle L Hughes; Jenny L Goehring
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 4.  [Intraoperative audiological-technical diagnostics during cochlear implant surgery].

Authors:  T Wesarg; S Arndt; A Aschendorff; R Laszig; S Zirn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Effect of depth of general anesthesia on the threshold of electrically evoked compound action potential in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Ali Eftekharian; Maryam Amizadeh; Kamran Mottaghi; Farhad Safari; Mozhgan Hosseinerezai Mahani; Leila Azadeh Ranjbar; Ali Abdi; Nooshin Mokari
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Use of telehealth for research and clinical measures in cochlear implant recipients: a validation study.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jenny L Goehring; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Gina R Diaz; Todd Sanford; Roger Harpster; Daniel L Valente
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Determining electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds: a comparison of computer versus human analysis methods.

Authors:  E Katelyn Glassman; Michelle L Hughes
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 8.  Advances in cochlear implant telemetry: evoked neural responses, electrical field imaging, and technical integrity.

Authors:  Lucas H M Mens
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-09

9.  A physiological and behavioral system for hearing restoration with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Julia King; Ina Shehu; J Thomas Roland; Mario A Svirsky; Robert C Froemke
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Prediction of the Functional Status of the Cochlear Nerve in Individual Cochlear Implant Users Using Machine Learning and Electrophysiological Measures.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skidmore; Lei Xu; Xiuhua Chao; William J Riggs; Angela Pellittieri; Chloe Vaughan; Xia Ning; Ruijie Wang; Jianfen Luo; Shuman He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.