Literature DB >> 17701445

Assessment of left ventricular function: comparison of cardiac multidetector-row computed tomography with two-dimension standard echocardiography for assessment of left ventricular function.

Darpan Bansal1, Robin M Singh, Mrinalini Sarkar, Ravi Sureddi, Kelly C Mcbreen, Timothy Griffis, Anjan Sinha, Jawahar L Mehta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare global Left Ventricular (LV) systolic function assessment by 16-detector row Computed Tomography (MDCT) with Two-Dimensional Standard Echocardiography (2DSE) in a routine cardiology practice setting and to ascertain the degree of correlation between LV volumes and measurements obtained by 2DSE with those measured by MDCT.
METHODS: In 52 patients with suspected coronary artery disease, a contrast enhanced MDCT study was performed using retrospective gating without dose modulation for better endocardial delineation. Eight phases of the cardiac cycle were analyzed to identify the end-diastolic and end-systolic phases. 2DSE was performed on the same day. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic volumes and ejection fraction were calculated in 4-chamber, 2-chamber and biplane (average of the two) views. Endocardial tracing was used to measure ventricular volumes by area length method for CT and Simpson's method for echocardiography.
RESULTS: On MDCT, mean LV ejection fraction (LVEF) in 4-chamber, 2-chamber and biplane views were 58.4 +/- 12, 59.3 +/- 12 and 59.7 +/- 12% respectively. On 2DSE, mean LVEF in 4-chamber, 2-chamber and biplane views were 58 +/- 14, 57 +/- 16 and 58 +/- 13% respectively. LVEF correlated best using the biplane views (r = 0.59 and P < 0.01) compared to 2-chamber (r = 0.57 and P < 0.01) and 4-chamber views (r = 0.32 and P = 0.02). Biplane measurement by these two techniques correlated well for LV volumes in both diastole (r = 0.69 and P < 0.01) and systole (r = 0.73 and P < 0.01), although MDCT consistently gave higher values.
CONCLUSIONS: MDCT can be a useful tool to measure LVEF while patients are undergoing CT coronary angiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17701445     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-007-9252-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  12 in total

1.  Role of Contrast Echocardiography for the Assessment of Left Ventricular Function.

Authors:  Roxy Senior
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.724

2.  Global and regional left ventricular function assessment with 16-detector row CT: comparison with echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Liesbeth P Salm; Joanne D Schuijf; Albert de Roos; Hildo J Lamb; Hubert W Vliegen; J Wouter Jukema; Raoul Joemai; Ernst E van der Wall; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2005-08-10

3.  Echo planar MRI of the heart on a standard system: validation of measurements of left ventricular function and mass.

Authors:  H J Lamb; J Doornbos; E A van der Velde; M C Kruit; J H Reiber; A de Roos
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Interstudy reproducibility of dimensional and functional measurements between cine magnetic resonance studies in the morphologically abnormal left ventricle.

Authors:  R C Semelka; E Tomei; S Wagner; J Mayo; G Caputo; M O'Sullivan; W W Parmley; K Chatterjee; C Wolfe; C B Higgins
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes by real-time, two-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison of cineangiographic and radionuclide techniques.

Authors:  E D Folland; A F Parisi; P F Moynihan; D R Jones; C L Feldman; D E Tow
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Noninvasive evaluation of left ventricular function: the ejection fraction.

Authors:  E D Folland; A F Parisi
Journal:  Compr Ther       Date:  1979-07

8.  Evaluation of left ventricular dysfunction using multiphasic reconstructions of coronary multi-slice computed tomography data in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease: validation against cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Sandra S Halliburton; Martin Petersilka; Paulo R Schvartzman; Nancy Obuchowski; Richard D White
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  The prognostic value of submaximal exercise testing with radionuclide ventriculography before hospital discharge in patients with recent myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J R Corbett; G J Dehmer; S E Lewis; W Woodward; E Henderson; R W Parkey; C G Blomqvist; J T Willerson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Risk stratification and survival after myocardial infarction.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-08-11       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  11 in total

1.  Assessment of global function of left ventricle with dual-source CT in patients with severe arrhythmia: a comparison with the use of two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Song Soo Kim; Sung Min Ko; Meong Gun Song; Joon Suk Kim
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Functional parameters of the left ventricle: comparison of cardiac MRI and cardiac CT in a large population.

Authors:  A Palumbo; E Maffei; C Martini; G Messalli; S Seitun; R Malagò; A Aldrovandi; E Emiliano; A Cuttone; A Weustink; N Mollet; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Comparison of global left ventricular function using 20 phases with 10-phase reconstructions in multidetector-row computed tomography.

Authors:  Yeon-jee Ko; Song Soo Kim; Woon-Ju Park; Jin-Ok Jeong; Sung Min Ko
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  MDCT coronary angiography vs 2D echocardiography for the assessment of left ventricle functional parameters.

Authors:  R Malagò; D Tavella; W Mantovani; M D'Onofrio; G Caliari; A Pezzato; L Nicolì; P Benussi; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  Role of cardiac CTA in estimating left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction.

Authors:  Robin Man Singh; Balkrishna Man Singh; Jawahar Lal Mehta
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-09-28

6.  Effects of propranolol on the left ventricular volume of normal subjects during CT coronary angiography.

Authors:  Yuan Heng Mo; Fu Shan Jaw; Yung Cheng Wang; Chin Ming Jeng; Shinn Forng Peng
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Left ventricular ejection fraction: real-world comparison between cardiac computed tomography and echocardiography in a large population.

Authors:  E Maffei; G Messalli; A Palumbo; C Martini; S Seitun; A Aldrovandi; A Cuttone; E Emiliano; R Malagò; A Weustink; N Mollet; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion with 64-slice multidetector CT: a comparison with two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  S-M Ko; Y-J Kim; J-H Park; N-M Choi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Left and right ventricle assessment with Cardiac CT: validation study vs. Cardiac MR.

Authors:  Erica Maffei; Giancarlo Messalli; Chiara Martini; Koen Nieman; Onofrio Catalano; Alexia Rossi; Sara Seitun; Andrea I Guaricci; Carlo Tedeschi; Nico R Mollet; Filippo Cademartiri
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Chamber dimensions and functional assessment with coronary computed tomographic angiography as compared to echocardiography using American Society of Echocardiography guidelines.

Authors:  Michael Rose; Bernard Rubal; Edward Hulten; Jennifer N Slim; Kevin Steel; James L Furgerson; Todd C Villines; Ahmad M Slim
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2014-02-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.