PURPOSE: Multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) is an emerging technique for the angiographic assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). The purpose of this work was to determine if multiphasic reconstructions of the same data used for the assessment of CAD could also be used for global functional evaluation of the left ventricle (LV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with chronic ischemic heart disease (CIHD) were imaged for CAD using a contrast-enhanced retrospective electrocardiographic-gated spiral technique on a MSCT scanner. The same data were reconstructed at both end-diastole and end-systole in order to measure left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), end-systolic volume (LVESV), and ejection fraction (LVEF). The results were compared to values obtained using a cine true-fast imaging with steady-state precession technique on a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. Interobserver variability in the measurement from MSCT images was also evaluated. RESULTS: For LVEF, there was substantial agreement between MSCT and MRI (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.825); the intermodality reproducibility for LVEF (5%) was within an acceptable clinical range. However, mean values of LVEDV and LVESV with MSCT compared to cine MRI (LVEDV: 262.0 +/- 85.6 ml and 297.2 +/- 98.8 ml, LVESV: 196.2 +/- 75.6 ml and 218.6 +/- 90.99 ml, respectively) were significantly less for both volumes (p < 0.015). Intermodality variabilities for these measurements were high (15 and 13% for LVEDV and LVESV, respectively). Readers' mean measurements of LVESV from MSCT images were significantly different (p = 0.003) resulting in differences in calculation of LVEF (p < 0.024). Still, interobserver variabilities for all values were acceptable (6, 8, and 5% for LVEDV, LVESV, and LVEF, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although values for LVEDV and LVESV were less with MSCT than with MRI, LVEF values were in agreement. This suggests that combined imaging of CAD and the evaluation of global LV dysfunction due to CIHD is feasible with the same MSCT acquisition.
PURPOSE: Multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) is an emerging technique for the angiographic assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). The purpose of this work was to determine if multiphasic reconstructions of the same data used for the assessment of CAD could also be used for global functional evaluation of the left ventricle (LV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with chronic ischemic heart disease (CIHD) were imaged for CAD using a contrast-enhanced retrospective electrocardiographic-gated spiral technique on a MSCT scanner. The same data were reconstructed at both end-diastole and end-systole in order to measure left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), end-systolic volume (LVESV), and ejection fraction (LVEF). The results were compared to values obtained using a cine true-fast imaging with steady-state precession technique on a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. Interobserver variability in the measurement from MSCT images was also evaluated. RESULTS: For LVEF, there was substantial agreement between MSCT and MRI (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.825); the intermodality reproducibility for LVEF (5%) was within an acceptable clinical range. However, mean values of LVEDV and LVESV with MSCT compared to cine MRI (LVEDV: 262.0 +/- 85.6 ml and 297.2 +/- 98.8 ml, LVESV: 196.2 +/- 75.6 ml and 218.6 +/- 90.99 ml, respectively) were significantly less for both volumes (p < 0.015). Intermodality variabilities for these measurements were high (15 and 13% for LVEDV and LVESV, respectively). Readers' mean measurements of LVESV from MSCT images were significantly different (p = 0.003) resulting in differences in calculation of LVEF (p < 0.024). Still, interobserver variabilities for all values were acceptable (6, 8, and 5% for LVEDV, LVESV, and LVEF, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although values for LVEDV and LVESV were less with MSCT than with MRI, LVEF values were in agreement. This suggests that combined imaging of CAD and the evaluation of global LV dysfunction due to CIHD is feasible with the same MSCT acquisition.
Authors: S Achenbach; S Ulzheimer; U Baum; M Kachelriess; D Ropers; T Giesler; W Bautz; W G Daniel; W A Kalender; W Moshage Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-12-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Stephen Schroeder; Andreas F Kopp; Axel Kuettner; Christof Burgstahler; Christian Herdeg; Martin Heuschmid; Andreas Baumbach; Claus D Claussen; Karl R Karsch; Ludger Seipel Journal: Clin Imaging Date: 2002 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.605
Authors: Andreas H Mahnken; Ernst Klotz; Anja Hennemuth; Bettina Jung; Ralf Koos; Joachim E Wildberger; Rolf W Günther Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2003-08-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Roman Fischbach; Kai Uwe Juergens; Murat Ozgun; David Maintz; Matthias Grude; Harald Seifarth; Walter Heindel; Thomas Wichter Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-09-29 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Darpan Bansal; Robin M Singh; Mrinalini Sarkar; Ravi Sureddi; Kelly C Mcbreen; Timothy Griffis; Anjan Sinha; Jawahar L Mehta Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2007-08-16 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Rakesh K Sharma; Donald J Voelker; Rajiv K Sharma; Vibhuti N Singh; Girish Bhatt; Mathilde Moazazi; Teresa Nash; Hanumanth K Reddy Journal: Vasc Health Risk Manag Date: 2010-05-25