Literature DB >> 2141222

Interstudy reproducibility of dimensional and functional measurements between cine magnetic resonance studies in the morphologically abnormal left ventricle.

R C Semelka1, E Tomei, S Wagner, J Mayo, G Caputo, M O'Sullivan, W W Parmley, K Chatterjee, C Wolfe, C B Higgins.   

Abstract

The validity of geometric formulas to derive mass and volumes in the morphologically abnormal left ventricle is problematic. Imaging techniques that are tomographic and therefore inherently three-dimensional should be more reliable and reproducible between studies in such ventricles. Determination of reproducibility between studies is essential to define the limits of an imaging technique for evaluating the response to therapy. Sequential cine magnetic resonance (MR) studies were performed on patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 11) and left ventricular hypertrophy (n = 8) within a short interval in order to assess interstudy reproducibility. Left ventricular mass, volumes, ejection fraction, and end-systolic wall stress were determined by two independent observers. Between studies, left ventricular mass was highly reproducible for hypertrophied and dilated ventricles, with percent variability less than 6%. Ejection fraction and end-diastolic volume showed close reproducibility between studies, with percent variability less than 5% End-systolic volume varied by 4.3% and 4.5% in dilated cardiomyopathy and 8.4% and 7.2% in left ventricular hypertrophy for the two observers. End-systolic wall stress, which is derived from multiple measurements, varied the greatest, with percent variability of 17.2% and 15.7% in dilated cardiomyopathy and 14.8% and 13% in left ventricular hypertrophy, respectively. The results of this study demonstrate that mass, volume, and functional measurements are reproducible in morphologically abnormal ventricles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2141222     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8703(05)80187-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  58 in total

1.  Evaluation of left ventricular wall motion, volumes, and ejection fraction by gated myocardial tomography with technetium 99m-labeled tetrofosmin: a comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  P Vaduganathan; Z X He; G W Vick; J J Mahmarian; M S Verani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Evaluation of left ventricular endocardial volumes and ejection fractions computed from gated perfusion SPECT with magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of two methods.

Authors:  T L Faber; J P Vansant; R I Pettigrew; J R Galt; M Blais; G Chatzimavroudis; C D Cooke; R D Folks; S M Waldrop; E Gurtler-Krawczynska; M D Wittry; E V Garcia
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Dual breath-hold magnetic resonance cine evaluation of global and regional cardiac function.

Authors:  Bernd J Wintersperger; Spencer Sincleair; Val M Runge; Olaf Dietrich; Armin Huber; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cardiac function.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; Craig A Hamilton; Pairoj Rerkpattanapipat
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Single breath-hold magnetic resonance cine imaging for fast assessment of global and regional left ventricular function in clinical routine.

Authors:  Kai Nassenstein; Holger Eberle; Stefan Maderwald; Christoph J Jensen; Christina Heilmaier; Thomas Schlosser; Oliver Bruder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  Novel techniques for assessment of left ventricular systolic function.

Authors:  Sonal Chandra; Hicham Skali; Ron Blankstein
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.214

9.  Non-invasive cardiac evaluation in heart failure patients using magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Stephanie M Shors; William G Cotts; Biljana Pavlovic-Surjancev; Mihai Gheorghiade; James C Carr; Richard M McCarthy; Scott F Pereles; Paul J Finn
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.214

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging of regional cardiac function in the mouse.

Authors:  E Heijman; G J Strijkers; J Habets; B Janssen; K Nicolay
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2004-12-20       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.