Literature DB >> 16098814

Global and regional left ventricular function assessment with 16-detector row CT: comparison with echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Liesbeth P Salm1, Joanne D Schuijf, Albert de Roos, Hildo J Lamb, Hubert W Vliegen, J Wouter Jukema, Raoul Joemai, Ernst E van der Wall, Jeroen J Bax.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) global and regional left ventricular (LV) function assessment with echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 25 patients, who were referred for noninvasive angiography with 16-detector row CT, LV function assessment was also performed. A subsequent echocardiogram was performed, and in a subgroup of patients, CMR examination was completed to evaluate LV function. For global function assessment, the LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was calculated. Regional LV function was scored using a 17-segment model and a 4-point scoring system. MDCT agreed well with echocardiography for the assessment of LVEF (r=0.96; bias 0.54%; p<0.0001) and regional LV function (kappa=0.78). Eight patients had no contra-indications and gave informed consent for CMR examination. A fair correlation between MDCT and CMR was demonstrated in the assessment of LVEF (r=0.86; bias -1.5%; p<0.01). Regional LV function agreement between MDCT and CMR was good (kappa=0.86).
CONCLUSION: MDCT agreed well with both echocardiography and CMR in the assessment of global and regional LV function. Global and regional LV function may accurately be evaluated by 16-detector row CT, and can be added to a routine CT image analysis protocol without need for additional contrast or imaging time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16098814     DOI: 10.1016/j.euje.2005.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr        ISSN: 1532-2114


  25 in total

1.  Assessment of global function of left ventricle with dual-source CT in patients with severe arrhythmia: a comparison with the use of two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Song Soo Kim; Sung Min Ko; Meong Gun Song; Joon Suk Kim
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  MSCT is better than stress perfusion imaging for detecting CAD--For.

Authors:  Filippo Cademartiri; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Noninvasive modalities for the assessment of left ventricular function: all are equal but some are more equal than others.

Authors:  Tiong Keng Lim; Roxy Senior
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Comprehensive cardiac CT study: evaluation of coronary arteries, left ventricular function, and myocardial perfusion--is it possible?

Authors:  Ricardo C Cury; Koen Nieman; Michael D Shapiro; Khurram Nasir; Roberto C Cury; Thomas J Brady
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Accurate estimation of global and regional cardiac function by retrospectively gated multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Bénédicte Belge; Emmanuel Coche; Agnès Pasquet; Jean-Louis J Vanoverschelde; Bernhard L Gerber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Assessment of left ventricular function: comparison of cardiac multidetector-row computed tomography with two-dimension standard echocardiography for assessment of left ventricular function.

Authors:  Darpan Bansal; Robin M Singh; Mrinalini Sarkar; Ravi Sureddi; Kelly C Mcbreen; Timothy Griffis; Anjan Sinha; Jawahar L Mehta
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Reference values for quantitative left ventricular and left atrial measurements in cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Paul Stolzmann; Hans Scheffel; Sebastian Leschka; Thomas Schertler; Thomas Frauenfelder; Philipp A Kaufmann; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Assessment of left ventricular volumes, ejection fraction and regional wall motion with retrospective electrocardiogram triggered 320-detector computed tomography: a comparison with 2D-echocardiography.

Authors:  Arthur Nasis; Stuart Moir; Sujith K Seneviratne; James D Cameron; Philip M Mottram
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Evaluation of left ventricular function using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Suchi Grover; Darryl P Leong; Joseph B Selvanayagam
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with low-to-intermediate risk.

Authors:  F Cademartiri; E Maffei; A Palumbo; R Malagò; F Alberghina; A Aldrovandi; V Brambilla; G Runza; L La Grutta; A Menozzi; L Vignali; G Casolo; M Midiri; N R Mollet
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-10-21       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.