Literature DB >> 17701230

Value of predictive instruments to determine persisting restriction of function in patients with subacute non-specific low back pain. Systematic review.

Roger Hilfiker1, Lucas M Bachmann, Carolin A-M Heitz, Tobias Lorenz, Harri Joronen, Andreas Klipstein.   

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) can restrict function with all the personal, interpersonal, and social consequences, such as a loss of independence and the inability to fulfil diverse roles in social life. Therefore, the prevention of the consequences of LBP would reduce costs, individual burdens and social burdens. Being able to fulfil the requirements of daily living is a cornerstone of quality of life. Early identification of patients who are likely to develop chronic pain with persistent restricted function is important, as effective prevention needs informed allocation of health care and social work. The aim of this study was to report and discuss the predictive value of instruments used to identify patients at risk of chronic LBP. Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Central, PEDro, Psyndex, PsychInfo/PsycLit, and Sociofile were systematically searched up to July 2004. Reference lists of systematic reviews on risk factors, and reference lists of the studies included were also searched. The selected studies evaluated predictive values of tools or predictive models applied 2-12 weeks after an initial medical consultation for a first or a new episode of non-specific LBP with restriction in function. Instruments had to predict function-related outcomes. Because of the heterogeneity of the instruments used we did not pool the data. Sixteen publications on function-related outcomes were included. The predictive instruments in these studies showed only moderate ability to predict or explain function-related outcome (maximal 51% of the variability). There was great variability in the predictors included and not all known risk factors were included in the models. The reviewed tools showed a limited ability to predict function-related outcome in patients with risk of chronic low back pain. Future instruments should be based on models with a comprehensive set of known risk factors. These models should be constructed and validated by international, coordinated research teams.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17701230      PMCID: PMC2223341          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0433-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  40 in total

Review 1.  Occupational psychological factors increase the risk for back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  S J Linton
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-03

2.  Comparison of three active therapies for chronic low back pain: results of a randomized clinical trial with one-year follow-up.

Authors:  A F Mannion; M Müntener; S Taimela; J Dvorak
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 3.  The need for caution in interpreting high quality systematic reviews.

Authors:  K Hopayian
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-22

4.  Comparison of two different approaches for the analysis of data from a prospective cohort study: an application to work related risk factors for low back pain.

Authors:  W E Hoogendoorn; P M Bongers; H C W de Vet; J W R Twisk; W van Mechelen; L M Bouter
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care.

Authors:  Maurits van Tulder; Annette Becker; Trudy Bekkering; Alan Breen; Maria Teresa Gil del Real; Allen Hutchinson; Bart Koes; Even Laerum; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Beyond the good prognosis. Examination of an inception cohort of patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  T S Carey; J M Garrett; A M Jackman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  The relationship between psychosocial work characteristics and low back pain: underlying methodological issues.

Authors:  K G Davis; C A Heaney
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 8.  Employment-related factors in chronic pain and chronic pain disability.

Authors:  R W Teasell; C Bombardier
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.442

9.  The effects of common medical interventions on pain, back function, and work resumption in patients with chronic low back pain: A prospective 2-year cohort study in six countries.

Authors:  T H Hansson; E K Hansson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  What do we mean by validating a prognostic model?

Authors:  D G Altman; P Royston
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-02-29       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  19 in total

1.  Who will have Sustainable Employment After a Back Injury? The Development of a Clinical Prediction Model in a Cohort of Injured Workers.

Authors:  Heather M Shearer; Pierre Côté; Eleanor Boyle; Jill A Hayden; John Frank; William G Johnson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-09

2.  Prognostic occupational factors for persistent low back pain in primary care.

Authors:  Markus Melloh; Achim Elfering; Cathy M Chapple; Anja Käser; Cornelia Rolli Salathé; Thomas Barz; Christoph Röder; Jean-Claude Theis
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Acute low back pain and primary care: how to define recovery and chronification?

Authors:  Wolf E Mehling; Viranjini Gopisetty; Michael Acree; Alice Pressman; Tim Carey; Harley Goldberg; Frederick M Hecht; Andrew L Avins
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  [Measures of success in treatment of chronic back pain: pain intensity, disability and functional capacity: determinants of treatment success in multimodal day clinic setting].

Authors:  M Heinrich; K Hafenbrack; C Michel; D Monstadt; U Marnitz; R Klinger
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 5.  Predictive value of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire and the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire for persisting problems.

Authors:  Martin Sattelmayer; Tobias Lorenz; Christoph Röder; Roger Hilfiker
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Distinctiveness of psychological obstacles to recovery in low back pain patients in primary care.

Authors:  Nadine E Foster; Elaine Thomas; Annette Bishop; Kate M Dunn; Chris J Main
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 7.926

7.  Acute Low Back Pain: Differential Somatosensory Function and Gene Expression Compared With Healthy No-Pain Controls.

Authors:  Angela R Starkweather; Divya Ramesh; Debra E Lyon; Umaporn Siangphoe; Xioayan Deng; Jamie Sturgill; Amy Heineman; R K Elswick; Susan G Dorsey; Joel Greenspan
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.442

8.  Predicting non return to work after orthopaedic trauma: the Wallis Occupational Rehabilitation RisK (WORRK) model.

Authors:  François Luthi; Olivier Deriaz; Philippe Vuistiner; Cyrille Burrus; Roger Hilfiker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Development of a screening tool predicting the transition from acute to chronic low back pain for patients in a GP setting: protocol of a multinational prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Markus Melloh; Nikolaus Aebli; Achim Elfering; Christoph Röder; Thomas Zweig; Thomas Barz; Peter Herbison; Paul Hendrick; Suraj Bajracharya; Kirsten Stout; Jean-Claude Theis
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  No association between level of vitamin D and chronic low back pain in Swedish primary care: a cross-sectional case-control study.

Authors:  Andreas Thörneby; Lena Margareta Nordeman; Else Hellebö Johanson
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.581

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.