Literature DB >> 11566835

The need for caution in interpreting high quality systematic reviews.

K Hopayian1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2001        PMID： 11566835      PMCID： PMC1121240          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.323.7314.681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  31 in total

Review 1.  A critical review of reviews on the treatment of chronic low back pain.

Authors:  A D Furlan; J Clarke; R Esmail; S Sinclair; E Irvin; C Bombardier
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Conflicting conclusions from two systematic reviews of epidural steroid injections for sciatica: which evidence should general practitioners heed?

Authors:  K Hopayian; M Mugford
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  How do two meta-analyses of similar data reach opposite conclusions?

Authors:  M Lindbaek; P Hjortdahl
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-27

4.  Why we need a broad perspective on meta-analysis. It may be crucially important for patients.

Authors:  P C Gotzsche
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-09

5.  Teasing apart quality and validity in systematic reviews: an example from acupuncture trials in chronic neck and back pain.

Authors:  L A Smith; A D Oldman; H J McQuay; R A Moore
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  A comparison between epidural anaesthesia with and without corticosteroid in the treatment of sciatica.

Authors:  P Béliveau
Journal:  Rheumatol Phys Med       Date:  1971-02

Review 7.  Injection therapy for subacute and chronic benign low back pain.

Authors:  P J Nelemans; R A de Bie; H C de Vet; F Sturmans
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

8.  Double blind evaluation of extradural methyl prednisolone for herniated lumbar discs.

Authors:  W Snoek; H Weber; B Jørgensen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1977

9.  A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial.

Authors:  T C Chalmers; H Smith; B Blackburn; B Silverman; B Schroeder; D Reitman; A Ambroz
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1981-05

10.  The use of epidural steroids in the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  J M Cuckler; P A Bernini; S W Wiesel; R E Booth; R H Rothman; G T Pickens
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 5.284
View more
  9 in total

1.  Treating C. difficile.

Authors:  Bradley C Johnston; Sunita Vohra
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study.

Authors:  Giuseppe G L Biondi-Zoccai; Marzia Lotrionte; Antonio Abbate; Luca Testa; Enrico Remigi; Francesco Burzotta; Marco Valgimigli; Enrico Romagnoli; Filippo Crea; Pierfrancesco Agostoni
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-01-16

Review 3.  Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review.

Authors:  Anders W Jørgensen; Jørgen Hilden; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-10-06

4.  Opposing systematic reviews: the effects of two quality rating instruments on evidence regarding t'ai chi and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Sunny Y Alperson; Vance W Berger
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.579

5.  Value of predictive instruments to determine persisting restriction of function in patients with subacute non-specific low back pain. Systematic review.

Authors:  Roger Hilfiker; Lucas M Bachmann; Carolin A-M Heitz; Tobias Lorenz; Harri Joronen; Andreas Klipstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine.

Authors:  Klaus Linde; Stefan N Willich
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 18.000

7.  Effect of caudal epidural steroid or saline injection in chronic lumbar radiculopathy: multicentre, blinded, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Trond Iversen; Tore K Solberg; Bertil Romner; Tom Wilsgaard; Jos Twisk; Audny Anke; Oystein Nygaard; Toralf Hasvold; Tor Ingebrigtsen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-09-13

8.  Disagreement in primary study selection between systematic reviews on negative pressure wound therapy.

Authors:  Frank Peinemann; Natalie McGauran; Stefan Sauerland; Stefan Lange
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 9.  A commentary on randomized clinical trials: How to produce them with a good level of evidence.

Authors:  Olga Dumont Flecha; Dhelfeson Willya Douglas de Oliveira; Leandro Silva Marques; Patricia Furtado Gonçalves
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.